02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CONSUMER SURPLUS

In Chapter 1, we learned that one of the basic principles of economics is that

people are better off as a result of voluntary trade. Now that we have developed

the fundamental ideas of consumer choice, we can use the demand curve

to show how we can measure some of the gains that arise from economic

exchange.

Assume you go into a store to buy a can of soda. The store charges you $0.75.

If you are particularly thirsty, you might be willing to pay as much as $1.25 for that

can of soda. The difference between what you paid and what you would have been

willing to pay is called consumer surplus. It provides a measure of how much

you gained from the trade. In this example, you only had to pay $0.75 for something

for which you would have been willing to pay $1.25; the difference, or $0.50,

is your consumer surplus.

Earlier, we used the concept of marginal utility to determine Mary’s choice of

sweatshirts and pizzas. We can calculate from her demand curve the consumer

surplus that goes to Mary when she buys pizza. Suppose a pizza costs $10 and Mary

buys 13. From the information in Table 5.1, we can see that the 13th pizza gives her

a marginal utility of 10 and costs $10. But the 12th pizza she purchased also only

cost her $10, yet it yielded a marginal utility of 12. Mary is getting a bargain; she

would have been willing to pay more for the earlier pizzas. She would have been

willing to pay $12 for the 12th pizza. In fact, for her first pizza, she would

have been willing to pay $36, for the second $32, and so on. She would have

been willing to pay a total of $288 ($36 + $32 + $30 + $28 + $26 + $24 + $22

+ $20 + $18 + $16 + $14 + $12 + $10) for the 13 pizzas. The difference between

what she has to pay for 13 pizzas—$10 × 13 = $130—and what she would

have been willing to pay, $288, is her consumer surplus. In this example, her

surplus is $158.

Figure 5.8 shows Mary’s demand curve for pizzas. If the price of pizzas

is $36, she would purchase 1 pizza; if the price falls to $20, she would buy

8; and at a price of $10, she would buy 13. The total amount Mary would

have been willing to pay for 13 pizzas is the total area under the demand

curve between the vertical axis and 13, the combination of the blue and

yellow areas. This area is the sum as detailed in the previous paragraph.

The amount Mary actually has to pay is represented by the blue area—the

price, $10, times the quantity, 13 pizzas. Her consumer surplus is the

difference, the yellow area above the price line and below the demand

curve, over the range of the quantity purchased.

There is always some consumer surplus so long as the consumer has

to pay only a fixed price for all the items she purchases. The downward

slope of demand curves means the previous units the consumer purchases

are more valuable than the marginal units. She would have been willing

to pay more for the earlier units than for the last unit, but she does

not have to.

We can use the concept of consumer surplus to measure the effect on

consumers of the type of agricultural price floor we analyzed in Chapter 4

PRICE

40

36

32

28

24

20

16

12

10

8

4

0

Figure 5.8

Consumer surplus

Demand

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

NUMBER OF PIZZAS

CONSUMER SURPLUS

The demand curve plots the amount Mary would be

willing to pay for her 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and so on pizza.

The total amount she is willing to pay for 13 pizzas

is the area under the demand curve up to the 13th

pizza. The amount she actually has to pay is the

blue shaded area. The consumer surplus is the difference

between the two, the yellow shaded area

above the line and below the demand curve, over

the range of the quantity purchased.

UTILITY AND THE DESCRIPTION OF PREFERENCES ∂ 117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!