02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

There is one last case to consider. Suppose that increasing all inputs in proportion

leads to a more than proportionate increase in output. Suppose, for example, that when

all inputs are increased by 20 percent, output jumps by 25 percent. This is a case of

increasing returns to scale, sometimes described as economies of scale. Big is beautiful

in this case, since average costs decline as the scale of the firm is increased.

Increasing returns to scale are common at low and moderate levels of production. As

a company expands from one plant to ten plants, it still needs only one corporate headquarters

building. Moreover, it has to pay the cost for the basic design of its plants only

once. Companies with many outlets or stores, such as McDonald’s or Wal-Mart, typically

use a very small number of store designs, whether they are opening in Florida

or Minnesota. Since these costs associated with running the firm—the overhead costs—

do not increase in proportion to the increase in production, long-run average cost

curves may be slightly downward sloping, as illustrated in Figure 6.9A.

For most firms, however, diminishing returns to scale eventually set in as production

levels become very large. As the firm increases its size, adding additional

plants, it starts to face increasing managerial problems; it may have to add layer

upon layer of management, and each of these layers increases costs. Long-run

average costs start to rise with output at high levels of output, as illustrated in

Figure 6.9B.

Yet in some industries, increasing returns to scale are possible even for very

large outputs. As the firm produces a higher output, it can take advantage of machines

that are larger and more efficient than those used by smaller firms. Software companies

may enjoy increasing returns to scale. Once the program code is written, the

firms can expand production with very little additional costs—just the costs of blank

CDs to hold the programs and the costs for distribution. At higher production levels,

the initial costs of developing and writing the software are spread over a larger

output, leading to declining average costs. If there are increasing returns to scale,

the long-run average cost curve and the marginal cost curve will be downward

sloping, as in Figure 6.9C.

COST (DOLLARS PER UNIT)

A

Long-run

average

cost curve

Marginal cost curve

COST (DOLLARS PER UNIT)

Marginal

cost curve

Long-run

average

cost curve

B

COST (DOLLARS PER UNIT)

Marginal

cost curve

C

Long-run

average

cost curve

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

OUTPUT

Figure 6.9

LONG-RUN AVERAGE COSTS

Panel A shows that with overhead costs, long-run average costs may be declining, but

they flatten out as output increases. In panel B, with managerial costs increasing with the

scale of the firm, eventually average and marginal costs may start to rise. Panel C shows

that if there are increasing returns to scale, long-run costs may be continuously falling.

SHORT-RUN AND LONG-RUN COST CURVES ∂ 145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!