02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

An important implication of this conclusion is a consensus belief about macroeconomic

policy: governments should not try to use macroeconomic policies to maintain

the unemployment rate below the natural rate or output above potential.

Expansionary policies will temporarily lower unemployment and boost income,

but eventually unemployment returns to the natural rate. Thus, the policy question

is whether the temporary fall in unemployment is worth the potential cost of

higher inflation.

A key issue for policymakers is identifying the natural rate of unemployment

and potential GDP in a dynamic economy. At one time, economists thought the natural

rate was around 6 percent. Unemployment rates below that level were expected

to lead to increases in the inflation rate. When the unemployment rate fell below 6

percent in 1995 and below 5 percent in 1997 without causing inflation to rise, economists

needed to reassess their estimates. We will discuss shifts in the natural rate

later in this chapter.

Wrap-Up

BASICS OF INFLATION ADJUSTMENT

Short-run inflation adjustment (SRIA) curve: shows the relationship between inflation

and output for given inflation expectations; the higher that output is, relative to

potential, the higher the inflation rate.

Expectations-augmented SRIA curve: the SRIA curve with expectations of inflation

explicitly incorporated. The level of inflation associated with any level of output depends

on expectations concerning inflation; the higher the inflationary expectations,

the higher the level of inflation associated with any level of output. As inflationary

expectations increase, the SRIA curve shifts up.

Case in Point

NOBEL VIEWS ON INFLATION AND

UNEMPLOYMENT

Our understanding of the shifting relationship between unemployment

and inflation owes much to the contributions of Milton Friedman and Robert

Lucas, the 1976 and 1995 winners of the Nobel Prize in Economics. Friedman

and Lucas are two of the giants of monetary economics. Friedman is most widely

known for his emphasis on the role of monetary policy as a force in shaping the

course of inflation and business cycles. He is best known to the lay public for his

advocacy of free markets. Lucas is probably unfamiliar to most noneconomists,

but like Friedman, he has made fundamental contributions to the study of money,

inflation, and business cycles.

SHORT-RUN INFLATION ADJUSTMENT ∂ 827

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!