02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thinking Like an Economist

EMPLOYMENT FLUCTUATIONS AND TRADE-OFFS

We measure the cost of cyclical unemployment by the

output that could have been produced if full employment

had been maintained. This represents the opportunity

cost to society of cyclical unemployment. Not all unemployment

represents an opportunity cost, either to the

individual worker or to society. A worker who voluntarily

quits a job to look for another is classified as unemployed,

but she must believe that the value of seeking a new job,

one that either pays better or has other advantages over

her old job, exceeds the temporary loss in wages. Time

spent in job search can thus represent a productive use

of time.

To measure the cost of employment fluctuations,

we need to take into account the trade-offs that individuals

face. For some, the value of time spent in leisure and other

nonmarket activities (taking care of children, for example)

is greater than the real wage that could be earned from

working.

In Chapter 22 we learned that according to Okun’s Law, the unemployment rate

rises above the natural rate of unemployment level (the unemployment rate at full

employment) by 1 percentage point for every 2 percentage points that the output gap

shrinks. Using Okun’s Law, we can translate an 8 percent output gap such as the

United States experienced in the 1982 recession into an added 4 percentage points of

unemployment. Since most estimates at the time placed the natural rate of unemployment

at around 6 percent, the figure provided via Okun’s Law (about 10 percent

unemployment) is consistent with the actual 9.7 percent unemployment rate in 1982.

As a lingering result of the recession in 2001, the unemployment rate averaged

6.0 percent in 2002. Most estimates of the natural rate of unemployment for 2002 put

it in the range of 5 to 5.5 percent. We can use this information, together with Okun’s

Law, to estimate the output cost of 2002’s cyclical unemployment. For the purposes

of this example, we will set the natural rate of unemployment at 5 percent.

Step 1: Cyclical unemployment is the difference between the actual unemployment

rate (6 percent) and the rate estimated to correspond to full

employment (5 percent), or 1 percent.

Step 2: Okun’s Law tells us that the percentage gap between actual output and

full-employment output is about twice the level of cyclical unemployment.

So the lost output was roughly 2 × 1 = 2 percent of real GDP.

Step 3: In 2002, real GDP was $10 trillion. Thus $200 billion (2 percent of $10 trillion)

is the value of the output lost as a result of cyclical unemployment that year.

Why Economies Experience

Fluctuations

It is difficult to reconcile the economic fluctuations we observe, and the associated

changes in unemployment, with the full-employment model. According to the

WHY ECONOMIES EXPERIENCE FLUCTUATIONS ∂ 643

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!