02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

calculations of this kind allowed it to determine how much of every good should

be produced. It then worked backward, figuring out how much each plant in

the country should produce. Factory managers were given production quotas—

they should produce so many tons of steel, or so many nails. Factory managers also

were allocated inputs with which to produce the output. This system was called

central planning.

The Failures of Communism The central planners decided on wage levels

and prices as well. Consumers did get to choose what to buy, but many commodities

were rationed. For example, each individual was allowed to buy only so many

pounds of sugar a month. Unfortunately, everything did not go according to plan.

Often there were shortages, especially for consumer goods. People had to wait in

line for hours to get the food they wanted every day, and they endured month-long

waits for consumer durables or a car. Factories also faced shortages: they often

could not get the inputs they needed. Deliveries did not occur on time, and when

the materials arrived they often were of poor quality. Factories that had been told

to produce nails produced nails, but they paid little attention to whether the nails were

too brittle or too soft to be used. They had incentives to meet the numerical quotas

set by the central planners, but no incentives to produce what others wanted. They

figured out ways of getting around the system; if they had to obtain more steel to

meet their quotas, they would find some firm that had been delivered more steel

than it needed and make a trade. Managers traded favors with each other—various

forms of barter occurred. Thus, an underground market developed.

The shortage of consumer goods was partly caused by an emphasis on development.

In 1917, at the time of the Soviet revolution, Russia was a relatively backward

country. In the 1930s, Stalin wanted to push the country forward quickly. He

saw the road to success as heavy industrialization and pushed the building of steel

mills and the like. The hostility throughout the world toward the Soviet Union’s communist

system led the country to adopt an inward-looking economic policy; the

communist countries largely traded with each other. They wanted to be self-reliant.

For a while these strategies worked. The Soviet Union grew so rapidly that

after World War II it became one of the world’s two superpowers. It developed missiles

and nuclear weapons and even sent the first man into space. By 1956, Nikita

Khrushchev, then the Soviet Union’s leader, could boast that his country, with communism,

would bury the West, with its capitalism. Western textbooks described a

trade-off between growth and freedom; they granted that the Soviet Union might

be able to grow faster, but they asked whether the price, the sacrifice in freedom,

was worth it.

But the Soviet Union’s achievements masked growing problems in its economy:

in particular, an agricultural sector that was stagnating and an industrial

sector that, outside the military, could not keep up with the rapid pace of innovation

in the West. The gap between living standards grew. Mikhail Gorbachev, who

became the Soviet Union’s leader in 1985, began a process of political and economic

reforms, called perestroika, but events escaped his control. In 1991, popular

protests stopped an attempted military coup, followed soon after by the breakup

of the Soviet Union; each of the so-called republics that had constituted it became

an independent state.

ECONOMIES IN TRANSITION ∂ 809

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!