02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Inflation–Unemployment

Trade-Offs

Economists focus on trade-offs: if we want more of one thing, what do we have to

give up? Can we have lower average unemployment if we are willing to accept higher

average inflation? Does keeping inflation low and stable mean that output and unemployment

will fluctuate more? Chapter 31 provided the analytical basis for addressing

these questions. Clearly, we would like to have both low (and stable) inflation

and low (and stable) unemployment. Economists’ understanding of the trade-offs

that policymakers must face has evolved over time.

THE OLD INFLATION–UNEMPLOYMENT

TRADE-OFF

Fifty years ago, most economists thought that there was a trade-off between

the average level of unemployment and the average rate of inflation. Economists

who believed that the costs of inflation were high argued for lower inflation and

a higher unemployment rate, while those who held that the benefits of low inflation

were far outweighed by the costs of high unemployment argued for

lower unemployment rates and higher inflation. Thus, disagreements about

policy largely hinged on disagreements about the relative costs of inflation and

unemployment.

Attempts in the 1960s to exploit this trade-off by reducing unemployment to

levels much lower than previously experienced led, as our analysis in Chapter 31

predicted, to higher inflation. And rather than remaining stable at its new higher

level, the inflation rate continued to increase as long as unemployment remained

below the economy’s natural rate of unemployment. The economy ended up

back at potential GDP, with the same average levels of unemployment as before

but with higher inflation rates. During the 1970s, a consensus developed that

the economy could not enjoy a sustained level of unemployment below the

natural rate.

The experience of the 1960s and 1970s convinced most policymakers that no

trade-off exists between average rates of inflation and average rates of unemployment.

As we learned in Part Six, the average level of the unemployment rate and the rate

of real economic growth are determined by such fundamentals as technological

change, population growth, labor market institutions, and the skills of the workforce.

Because these factors are unrelated to the economy’s average rate of inflation,

allowing average inflation to rise brings no long-run benefit in the form of faster

growth or lower average unemployment. The choice facing policymakers appeared

to be a simple one—the economy could operate at full employment with low inflation,

or it could operate at full employment with high inflation. Obviously, low inflation

was preferable.

728 ∂ CHAPTER 33 THE ROLE OF MACROECONOMIC POLICY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!