02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Do Central Banks Respond Only to Inflation? We have assumed that

the central bank adjusts policy when inflation changes. This convenient simplification

captures an important aspect of how many major central banks conduct policy

today. It helps explain why the Fed did not initially raise interest rates as the unemployment

rate fell to very low levels in the late 1990s—as long as inflation seemed

stable, the Fed did not alter its policy.

But few central banks (if any!) react only to inflation. The goals of monetary

policy are low, stable inflation and overall economic stability and growth.

If the economy enters a recession, central banks normally lower interest rates to

help stimulate aggregate expenditures and moderate the rise in unemployment.

That the Fed cannot simply look at inflation is illustrated by two recent cases

in point.

Thinking Like an Economist

REAL VALUES MATTER FOR INCENTIVES

Economists believe that to understand how individuals and

firms behave, we should assume they make rational decisions.

In making decisions, individuals and firms respond to incentives.

But to affect decisions, a change in incentives has to be

a real change—it has to reflect an actual alteration in the

trade-offs the decision maker faces. A worker will thus be

concerned with how much her wages can purchase—the real

value of wages, not simply their amount in terms of dollars.

If a worker’s nominal wage rises by 10 percent but prices also

rise by 10 percent, her incentive to supply labor is unaffected.

Supplying an extra hour of labor increases her nominal income

by more than before, but it yields the same real income as it

did before prices and wages rose. The incentive to work is

unchanged.

Similarly, households and firms will base decisions about

borrowing and investing on the real costs of borrowing and

the real returns to investing, and the riskiness associated

with each. In deciding whether to borrow to finance a car,

an individual must weigh the consumption of other goods

and services that must be given up in order to make that purchase.

If the interest rate on the car loan is 12 percent, but

he expects prices and his nominal income to be rising at

3 percent each year because of inflation, then the dollars he

uses each year to pay the interest on the loan will be worth

3 percent less than the year before. The effective real interest

rate on the loan is 9 percent. Now suppose that when he

took out the car loan, inflation had been zero rather than 3 percent

per year. His incentive to borrow would be unaffected

if the interest rate on the loan fell to 9 percent: though he

would pay fewer dollars each year, those dollars would be

worth more since there is no inflation. The real cost is the

same; so if nothing else has changed, the incentives to borrow

are also unchanged.

The riskiness of an investment also depends on inflation.

Suppose you invest in a bond that will pay you 8 percent

interest for the next six years. It may seem to be

riskless—after all, you know you will receive 8 percent on

your investment. But if inflation turns out to average 2 percent,

your real return will only be 6 percent; and if inflation

averages 8 percent, your real return will be zero! Because

there is always some uncertainty about future inflation, real

returns will be uncertain even when the nominal rate of return

is fixed.

Economic decisions are based on the real interest rate,

not the nominal interest rate. Changes in the real interest rate

alter individuals’ incentives to act.

742 ∂ CHAPTER 33 THE ROLE OF MACROECONOMIC POLICY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!