02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EDUCATION AND ECONOMIC TRADE-OFFS

The production possibilities curve introduced in Chapter 2 can illustrate how

decisions concerning investments in human capital are made. To accomplish this,

we divide an individual’s life into two periods: “youth” and “later working years.”

Figure 9.6 depicts the relationship between consumption in youth and in later

life. As the individual gives up consumption in his youth, staying in school longer

increases his expected future consumption because he can expect his income to

go up. The curve has been drawn with a rounded shape. It shows diminishing

returns: spending more on education today (reducing consumption) raises future

income, but each additional investment in education provides a smaller and

smaller return.

Point A represents the case in which Everett is a full-time student through four

years of college, with little income until graduation (his youth) but with a high income

in later life. Point B represents the consequences of dropping out of school after

high school. When he does this, Everett has a higher income in his youth but a lower

income in later life. Other possible points between A and B represent cases where

Everett drops out of college after one or two years.

The Basic Competitive Model

CONSUMPTION AS ADULT

Figure 9.6

A

Consumption

possibilities

curve

B

CONSUMPTION IN YOUTH

EDUCATION AND THE TRADE-OFF

BETWEEN CURRENT AND FUTURE

CONSUMPTION

Point A represents a choice of a reduced consumption

and better education in the present,

with a higher consumption in the future. Point B

represents the choice of higher consumption

and less education now, with a lower level of

consumption in the future.

We now have completed our description of the basic competitive model.

Households make decisions about how much to consume and what goods

to purchase. They decide how much labor to supply and how much to save.

The firm in the competitive model takes the price it receives for the goods

it sells as given. The firm also takes the prices of the inputs it uses, including

the wages it pays workers and the cost of capital goods, as given.

At these prices, the firm chooses its outputs and inputs to maximize

profits. Prices adjust to ensure that demand and supply are equal. In the

labor market, wages bring demand and supply into balance; in the capital

market, the interest rate is the “price” that adjusts to balance supply

and demand.

We have now seen where the supply and demand curves that were introduced

in Chapters 3 and 4 come from, and why they have the shapes they do.

Whether we examine the household’s demand for goods, its supply of labor,

or its savings decision, the effects of price changes on the household’s choices

can be analyzed in terms of income and substitution effects. We also demonstrated

that firms balance marginal cost and price in deciding on production

levels, and they set the value of the marginal product equal to the price of an

input in deciding on their demand for factors of production such as labor and

capital. An increase in the real wage reduces the firm’s demand for labor.

An increase in the interest rate reduces the demand for capital. In the

next chapter, we will put all these results together to sketch a model of the

complete economy.

206 ∂ CHAPTER 9 CAPITAL MARKETS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!