02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Y goes from 7,000 to 8,000, disposable income goes from 5,300 (7,000 − 1,700) to

6,050 (8,000 − 1,950). Consumption rises from 4,600 to 5,200, an increase of 600.

The MPC is the increase in C per dollar increase in disposable income, or 600/750 =

.8. Using these values, we can calculate the multiplier to be 1/(1 − (1 − .25) × .8) =

1/(1 − .75 × 8) = 1/(1 − .6) = 1/.4 = 2.5, the same value we found directly by finding the

new equilibrium after an increase in G.

How would things change if we were dealing with an open economy? In an open

economy, aggregate expenditures consist of C + I + G + X − M, where X denotes

exports and M denotes imports. Suppose we have the information in Table 30.2.

Exports do not depend on the level of GDP; in our example, they are equal to 500.

Imports rise with income, and the example assumes a marginal propensity to import

of .1. Just as in the closed economy, equilibrium occurs when Y = AE. In this example,

as in the previous one, the equilibrium level of GDP is 7,000. For this economy,

net exports are positive at the equilibrium level of GDP. A comparison between the

AE column in the two tables reveals that as income rises, aggregate expenditures

increase faster in the closed economy than in the open economy. In the latter, a positive

marginal propensity to import means that imports rise as income rises, reducing

net exports.

Given a marginal propensity to import of .1, a marginal propensity to consume

of .8, and a marginal tax rate of .25, the formula for the multiplier tells us that a

$1 increase in G will increase equilibrium income by 1/[1 − .75(.8 − .1)] = 2.1. If

G increases by 400, then equilibrium income will increase by 840, from 7,000 to

7,840. Recall that in the closed economy described in Table 30.1, the multiplier

was 2.5. Again, the marginal propensity to import explains why it is smaller in the

open economy.

Table 30.2

EQUILIBRIUM OUTPUT IN AN OPEN ECONOMY

Y T C I G X M AE

1,000 200 1,000 1,200 1,100 900 200 4,000

2,000 450 1,600 1,200 1,100 900 300 4,500

3,000 700 2,200 1,200 1,100 900 400 5,000

4,000 950 2,800 1,200 1,100 900 500 5,500

5,000 1,200 3,400 1,200 1,100 900 600 6,000

6,000 1,450 4,000 1,200 1,100 900 700 6,500

7,000 1,700 4,600 1,200 1,100 900 800 7,000

8,000 1,950 5,200 1,200 1,100 900 900 7,500

9,000 2,200 5,800 1,200 1,100 900 1,000 8,000

10,000 2,450 6,400 1,200 1,100 900 1,100 8,500

11,000 2,700 7,000 1,200 1,100 900 1,200 9,000

12,000 2,950 7,600 1,200 1,100 900 1,300 9,500

13,000 3,200 8,200 1,200 1,100 900 1,400 10,000

682 ∂ CHAPTER 30 AGGREGATE EXPENDITURES AND INCOME

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!