02.05.2020 Views

[Joseph_E._Stiglitz,_Carl_E._Walsh]_Economics(Bookos.org) (1)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

just as if the government paid directly for child care or research. Accordingly, the

revenue lost from a tax subsidy is called a tax expenditure.

Administrative Simplicity Americans live in a complex society, and their

tax laws reflect and contribute to this complexity. As legislators have sought to

ensure that the tax laws are fair and apply uniformly to all people in similar situations,

the laws have become increasingly complex. High tax rates make it worthwhile

for individuals and businesses to think hard about legal means of minimizing

taxes. It may pay a businessperson to devote almost as much energy to tax avoidance

as to designing and producing a better product. The tax law has evolved out of this

constant battle between the government and taxpayers; as each new way of reducing

tax payments is discovered, the law is modified to close the loophole. Inevitably

another hole is discovered, and another repair job is attempted. Today the federal

tax law fills tens of thousands of pages.

The objective of administrative simplicity seems to remain elusive. Many economists

are convinced that the United States could have a tax system that is truly

simple to administer, but only if other objectives are given up. Some of its complexity

derives from the effort to have a progressive income tax and to tax the income

from capital.

Flexibility One of the weakest aspects of the U.S. tax system is its lack of flexibility.

Any time a tax change is proposed, all of the issues discussed here are raised.

Its effects on different groups and on efficiency are debated. Basic issues of values—

how progressive should the tax system be?—are aired once again, while specialinterest

groups try to take advantage of the chance to have favorable treatment

written into the code. Changing the tax law is thus extremely difficult—and very

time-consuming.

Transparency Though the merits of transparency are widely preached, governments

often prefer citizens to be ignorant of their total tax bill. The worry is that

knowledge might lead to “sticker shock” and that opposition to taxes might grow.

The overall impact of some taxes is more obvious than others. For instance, individuals

pay sales taxes in dribs and drabs; they never get a clear view of their total

payments. That may be one reason why politicians seem to love the sales tax so

much. Of all the parts of the tax system, the ultimate burden imposed by corporate

income tax is perhaps the least transparent. Although corporations write the check

to the IRS, most economists agree that much of the onus of paying taxes is shifted to

individuals and households, through reduced wages, higher product prices, or both.

Transfers

Earlier we noted the role of government in redistributing income: very poor individuals

receive more from the government than they contribute in taxes. There are

five major public benefit programs for low-income Americans: welfare, Medicaid,

food stamps, supplemental security income (SSI), and housing assistance. Until

386 ∂ CHAPTER 17 THE PUBLIC SECTOR

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!