11.07.2015 Views

Concept Richtlijn Erfelijke darmkanker 2007 versie 7 - Oncoline

Concept Richtlijn Erfelijke darmkanker 2007 versie 7 - Oncoline

Concept Richtlijn Erfelijke darmkanker 2007 versie 7 - Oncoline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

egarding colorectal and endometrial cancer, distress and health-related behaviour oneyear post-test. Genet Test 2005;9:54-65.7. Davey A, Rostant K, Harrop K, Goldblatt J, O’Leary P. Evaluating genetic counseling:client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service. J GenetCouns 2005;14:197-206.8. Emery J, Watson E, Rose P, Andermann A. A systematic review of the literatureexploring the role of primary care in genetic services. Fam Pract 1999;16:426-45.Review.9. Esplen MJ, Urquhart C, Butler K, Gallinger S, Aronson M, Wong J. The experience ofloss and anticipation of distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing.J Psychosom Res 2003;55:427-35.10. Fallowfield L, Ratcliffe D, Jenkins V, Saul J. Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition bydoctors in patients with cancer. Br J Cancer 2001;84:1011-5.11. Fry A, Campbell H, Gudmunsdottir H, Rush R, Porteous M, Gorman D et al. GPs' viewson their role in cancer genetics services and current practice. Fam Pract 1999;16:468-74.12. Geirdal AO, Reichelt JG, Dahl AA, Heimdal K, Maehle L, Stormorken A et al.Psychological distress in women at risk of hereditary breast/ovarian or HNPCC cancersin the absence of demonstrated mutations. Fam Cancer 2005;4;121-6.13. Gritz ER, Peterson SK, Vernon SW, Marani SK, Baile WF, Watts BG et al. Psychologicalimpact of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol2005;23:1902-10.14. Keller M, Sommerfeldt S, Fischer C, Knigth L, Riesbeck M, Lowe B et al. Recognition ofdistress and psychiatric morbidity in cancer patients: a multi-method approach. AnnOncol 2004;15:1243-9.15. Meyer TJ, Mark MM. Effects of psychosocial interventions with adult cancer patients: ameta-analysis of randomized experiments. Health Psychol 1995;14:101-8.16. Meiser B. Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: An update ofthe literature. Psycho-Oncology 2005; 14: 1060-74.17. Menko FH, Ligtenberg MJ, Brouwer T, Hahn D, Ausems M. DNA diagnostiek naarerfelijke aanleg voor tumoren. Een overzicht met aanbevelingen voor de praktijk. NedTijdschr Geneeskd <strong>2007</strong>; 151: 295-8.18. Murakami Y, Okamura H, Sugano K, Yoshida T, Kazuma K, Akechi T et al. Psychologicdistress after disclosure of genetic test results regarding hereditary nonpolyposiscolorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2004;101:395-403.19. NCCZ. Advies psychosociale zorg voor chronisch zieken. Zoetermeer: NationaleCommissie Chronisch Zieken, 1995.20. van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, Brocker-Vriends AH, van AsperenCJ, Sijmons RH et al. Prognostic factors for hereditary cancer distress six months afterBRCA1/2 or HNPCC genetic susceptibility testing. Eur J Cancer <strong>2007</strong>;43:71-721. van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Duivenvoorden HJ, Brocker-Vriends AH, van AsperenCJ, Sijmons RH et al. Experience of parental cancer in childhood is a risk factor forpsychological distress during genetic cancer susceptibility testing. Ann Oncol2006;17:1090-5.22. Pieterse AH , Ausems MG, Van Dulmen AM, Beemer FA, Bensing JM. Initial cancergenetic counseling consultation: change in counselees' cognitions and anxiety, andassociation with addressing their needs and preferences. Am J Med Genet A.2005;137:27-35.23. Pieterse AH, Van Dulmen AM, Ausems MG, Beemer FA, Bensing JM. Communication incancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees' previsit needs and preferences?Br J Cancer 2005;92:1671-8.<strong>Concept</strong> landelijke richtlijn erfelijke <strong>darmkanker</strong> <strong>versie</strong> 7 d.d. 7 november <strong>2007</strong>.133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!