02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Distance can be measured in more<br />

than one way<br />

CHAPTER 16 / Classification and <strong>Evolution</strong> 479<br />

used in Figure 16.2 is Euclidean distance: the straight line between two points; in two<br />

dimensions it is measured by Pythagoras’ theorem. But other distance measures exist,<br />

such as mean character distance (MCD). MCD is the average distance between the<br />

groups for all characters measured. Thus, in two dimensions, if species 1 and 2 differ by<br />

x units in character A and y units in character B, then MCD = (x + y)/2 and Euclidean<br />

distance =√(x 2 + y 2 ). The different measures of distance can give different hierarchies<br />

and the pheneticist is again faced with a subjective choice of which to use.<br />

Phenetic classification, therefore, even in its modern numerical form, is not objective.<br />

It can produce classifications, but classifications that lack a deep philosophical<br />

justification. Let us see how the introduction of evolution into classification can help<br />

with the problem.<br />

16.6 Phylogenetic classification uses inferred phylogenetic<br />

relations<br />

16.6.1 Hennig’s cladism classifies species by their phylogenetic<br />

branching relations<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Phylogenetic classifications group species solely according to recency of common<br />

ancestry. When a species splits during evolution it will usually form two descendant<br />

species, called sister species, and in a cladistic classification sister species are classified<br />

together. The branching hierarchy of ancestral relations is a unique hierarchy, extending<br />

back to the beginning, and including all, of life. The phylogenetic hierarchy is easy<br />

to convert into a classification (Figure 16.3). (I say it is “easy,” but in Section 16.6.3<br />

below we look at problems that arise in moving from a phylogenetic hierarchy to a<br />

Linnaean classificatory hierarchy.)<br />

(a) Phylogeny (b) Cladistic relations<br />

(c) Classification<br />

Figure 16.3<br />

The phylogenetic (cladistic) classification of a group is simply<br />

related to their phylogenetic tree. (a) The evolutionary history<br />

of seven species. (b) Their cladistic classification. (c) The<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

Order<br />

Suborder<br />

Species 1–7<br />

Family<br />

Species 4–7<br />

Genus<br />

Species 5–7<br />

Species<br />

Species 5–6<br />

Species 5<br />

formal Linnaean classification, for species 5 as an example.<br />

This particular classification is an example only; it could be,<br />

depending on the detail in a particular case, that different<br />

Linnaean levels should be used.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!