02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Figure 14.2<br />

Prezygotic isolation emerges<br />

between populations that have<br />

adapted to different conditions.<br />

(a) The experimental design:<br />

four populations of fruitflies<br />

were kept on starch medium<br />

and four others on maltose<br />

medium. After a number of<br />

generations the tendency of<br />

the flies to mate with others<br />

like themselves was measured.<br />

In the experimental series,<br />

12 females from a maltose<br />

population and 12 more from<br />

a starch population were put<br />

in a cage with 12 males from<br />

a starch and 12 males from a<br />

maltose population; the<br />

numbers of the four kinds of<br />

mating couple that formed were<br />

counted. One such experiment<br />

was done for each of the four<br />

starch populations with each of<br />

the four maltose populations,<br />

making 16 experiments in all.<br />

(b) An example of the results.<br />

(c) The average isolation for all<br />

16 experiments. In the control<br />

series, 12 females and 12 males<br />

from one of the four starch<br />

populations were put with<br />

another 12 males and 12<br />

females from another of the<br />

four starch populations; the<br />

same controls were done with<br />

the maltose populations too.<br />

Again, one example is given<br />

in (b): a pair may be formed<br />

between a male and a female<br />

from the same starch<br />

population, or a male from one<br />

of the four starch populations<br />

may pair with a female from<br />

a different starch population.<br />

Notice the higher value of<br />

the isolation index for the<br />

experimental crosses than the<br />

control ones in (c). Prezygotic<br />

isolation had evolved between<br />

the populations that had<br />

experienced different media,<br />

but not among populations<br />

that were isolated but on the<br />

same media. Drawn from<br />

data in Dodd (1989).<br />

(a)<br />

Mating<br />

experiments<br />

CHAPTER 14 / Speciation 385<br />

Initial sample of fruitflies<br />

Starch medium Maltose medium<br />

Lines evolve separately<br />

for several generations<br />

No preference<br />

(c) Average isolation indexes for all 16 crosses<br />

Preference for mate<br />

from maltose line<br />

(b) Examples of results<br />

Experimental cage Control cage<br />

Female Female<br />

Starch Maltose<br />

Male<br />

Starch<br />

22<br />

9<br />

Maltose<br />

8<br />

20<br />

Isolation index = ( ) = 0.42<br />

42 – 17<br />

Same Different<br />

Male<br />

Same<br />

18<br />

15<br />

Different 12<br />

15<br />

––––––<br />

59<br />

Isolation index = ( ) = 0.1<br />

33 – 27<br />

––––––<br />

60<br />

Starch × maltose population crosses<br />

Control crosses<br />

Average isolation index<br />

0.33<br />

0.014<br />

The isolation index is calculated as (number of matings to same type – number of matings to different type)/total number<br />

of matings. It varies from 1 (for complete reproductive isolation) to 0 (for random mating, or zero isolation) through to the<br />

theoretical extreme of –1 if matings were exclusively between opposite typed flies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!