02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

496 PART 4 / <strong>Evolution</strong> and Diversity<br />

Species occupy particular ecological<br />

niches ...<br />

. . . but history can also be<br />

influential<br />

17.2 Ecological characteristics of a species limit its<br />

geographic distribution<br />

The distributional limits of a species are set by its ecological attributes. One way of<br />

understanding how ecological factors limit a species’ distribution is in terms of a distinction,<br />

first made by Hutchinson and MacArthur in the 1950s, between the fundamental<br />

niche and the realized niche of a species. A species will be able to tolerate a certain<br />

range of physical factors a temperature, humidity, and so on a and could in theory live<br />

anywhere these tolerance limits were satisfied. This is its fundamental niche. However,<br />

competing species will often occupy part of this range and the competition may be too<br />

strong to permit both species to exist. Each species’ realized niche will then be smaller<br />

than its physiology would make possible: each will occupy a smaller range than it could<br />

in the absence of competition. Much ecological research has been carried out to discover<br />

the factors a whether physical or biological a that act to limit particular species’<br />

distributions.<br />

In some cases, a species’ distribution is limited ecologically, for example the species<br />

could not live outside its existing range because a competing species is present elsewhere.<br />

In other cases, a historic rather than ecological explanation is needed. The<br />

species may be ecologically capable of living at a place, but it is absent because it has<br />

never arrived a that is, it has never migrated and established itself.<br />

In what sense are ecological and historic factors alternatives? If we consider the<br />

particular distributional limit of a species, we can ask whether it lies at the limit of<br />

the species’ ecological tolerance, or whether the species could ecologically survive<br />

on the other side of the border but for some historic reason is not. It can therefore<br />

be meaningful to test between ecological and historic explanations. In most real cases,<br />

however, a complete account of a species’ distribution needs both ecological and<br />

historic knowledge. A species cannot live outside its ecological tolerance range; its<br />

biogeography therefore cannot contradict its ecology. However, within its ecological<br />

tolerances, historic factors may have determined where it is living and where it is<br />

not. The two factors will then not be opposed, and the sensible method of analysis<br />

is to work out how ecology and history have combined to produce the species’<br />

distribution.<br />

17.3 Geographic distributions are influenced by dispersal<br />

A species’ range will be changed if members of the species move in space, a process<br />

called dispersal. Individual animals and plants move, actively and passively, through<br />

space both in order to seek out unoccupied areas and in response to environmental<br />

change. (Plants move passively, at the seed stage.) When the climate cools, the ranges of<br />

species in the northern hemisphere move southwards, and tropical forests fragment<br />

into smaller forest patches. It would also be possible for the range of a species to<br />

change, when the climate changed, without the movement of individuals. Those in the<br />

colder regions (for example) might die off, and the range would shrink and move on<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!