02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

CHAPTER 17 / <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Biogeography 515<br />

Table 17.2<br />

Pattern of faunal exchange between North and South America in different time periods. The table gives the total numbers of genera<br />

of South or North American origin in each region (these are the numbers plotted in Figure 17.15), and breaks down the immigrant<br />

genera according to whether they were “primary” (that genus itself immigrated) or “secondary” (that genus descended from a<br />

primary immigrant genus, e.g., a secondary immigrant in North America evolved in there but came from a genus that itself evolved in<br />

South America). The total of the immigrant genera in the bottom two rows equals the number of alien genera in the “number of<br />

genera” row above. Note: (i) the similar proportions of primary immigrant genera moving in each direction, and (ii) the much<br />

greater numbers of secondary immigrants in South America than in the north. Modified from Marshall et al. (1982).<br />

South America North America<br />

Time period<br />

(Myr BP): 9–5 5–3 3–2 2–1 1–0.3 0.3–Recent 9.5–4.5 4.5–2 2–0.7 0.7–Recent<br />

Duration (Myr) 4 2 1 1 0.7 0.3 5 2.5 1.3 0.7<br />

Number of genera<br />

North American 1 4 10 29 49 61 128 99 90 102<br />

South American 72 68 62 55 58 59 3 8 11 12<br />

Total 73 72 72 84 107 120 131 107 101 114<br />

Number of<br />

immigrant genera<br />

Primary 1 1 2 10 18 20 2 6 8 9<br />

Secondary 0 3 8 19 31 41 1 2 3 3<br />

North America contained more<br />

species to begin with<br />

Patterns of speciation differed<br />

the total number is higher in the north, perhaps because of the continent’s greater area.<br />

(It is an important principle of island biogeography that a larger area supports a<br />

larger number of species.) Marshall et al. (1982) then counted the numbers of North<br />

American mammals moving south, and vice versa, and expressed them both as<br />

proportions of the total pool. They found that the proportions are about the same.<br />

Approximately 10% of available North American mammals invaded the south. (For<br />

instance, Table 17.2 shows that North America had about 100 endemic mammalian<br />

genera. Around 10 of them migrated south, with the number of primary immigrants<br />

going up from one to 10 between 3 and 1 million years ago.) Likewise, about 10% of<br />

South American mammals moved north. (In Table 17.2, there were 60 or so South<br />

American mammalian genera 3 million years ago. The number of South American genera<br />

in the north increased by about six between 4.5 and 1 million years ago.) The greater<br />

absolute numbers moving south is mainly due to the larger number of mammals in the<br />

north to begin with.<br />

The pattern of primary immigration is thus similar in both directions. Something<br />

like 10% of the genera from each side successfully invaded the other. But when we look<br />

at the subsequent proliferation of the immigrants, the pattern diverged markedly<br />

(Table 17.2). By the Recent period, a total of 12 (the nine in Table 17.2 is the number<br />

alive a three others had arrived and then gone extinct) immigrant southern mammal<br />

genera had produced only three new genera, while the 21 immigrant northern mammalian<br />

genera in the south produced 49 genera. In the Recent period the trend has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!