02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

398 PART 4 / <strong>Evolution</strong> and Diversity<br />

Box 14.1<br />

Haldane’s Rule is Probably (at Least in Part) Explained by the<br />

Dobzhansky–Muller Theory<br />

Postzygotic isolation in the Dobzhansky–Muller theory is caused by<br />

interactions between genes at many loci. Let us see what happens if<br />

one of the loci is on the X chromosome and one on an autosome<br />

(Figure B14.1). The two parental species have internally satisfactory<br />

combinations of genes, but the hybrid offspring contain gene<br />

Parental<br />

species<br />

Hybrid<br />

species<br />

Species 1<br />

X1 A1 A1<br />

Y1/ X1 A1 A1<br />

X1 A1 A1<br />

X2<br />

A2 A2<br />

Species 2<br />

X2 A2 A2<br />

Y2/ X2 A2 A2<br />

X1 A1 A1<br />

Y 2 A2 A2<br />

Female Male<br />

Figure B14.1<br />

The “dominance theory” of Haldane’s rule. Some gene<br />

combinations in hybrids will be new and incompatible:<br />

for example, X 1 /A 2 combinations (where X 1 /A 2 refers to<br />

a combination of one gene on the X chromosome from<br />

species 1 and another gene on an autosome of species 2).<br />

If the incompatible gene on the X chromosome is recessive<br />

then the gene combination will not be expressed in female<br />

hybrids (the X 2 gene is dominant) and female hybrids are<br />

alright. But in male hybrids the X 1 /A 2 combination is<br />

expressed because the male lacks an X 2 chromosome.<br />

Males have reduced fitness. The theory is illustrated as if<br />

for a fruitfly, in which males are heterogametic. In a species<br />

in which females are heterogametic, “males” and “females”<br />

would need to be reversed.<br />

combinations that are incompatible. A gene on the X chromosome<br />

of species 1 (X 1 ) may be incompatible with a gene on an autosome<br />

of species 2 (A 2 ). What matters is whether the defect caused by the<br />

incompatibility between X 1 and A 2 is dominant or recessive. If it is<br />

dominant, it will damage both male and female hybrid offspring; if it<br />

is recessive it will damage male but not female offspring. Thus the<br />

standard Dobzhansky–Muller theory can explain Haldane’s rule<br />

with the added assumption that some of the genes at work on the X<br />

chromosome are recessive. In all, we explain Haldane’s rule by two<br />

genetic properties: (i) postzygotic isolation is due to interactions<br />

between many gene loci (that is, epistasis), and some of these gene<br />

loci will be on the X chromosome; and (ii) some of these X-linked<br />

genes are recessive.<br />

This is called the “dominance” theory of Haldane’s rule. It works<br />

well for genes causing inviability in fruitflies. However, it is probably<br />

not a complete explanation. The genetic explanation for cases in<br />

which the heterogametic sex of hybrid offspring are inviable<br />

probably differs from cases in which they are sterile. Genes that<br />

influence viability usually affect males and females equally, because<br />

they are genes that influence the well-being of the whole body.<br />

Male bodies do differ in some respects from female bodies, and<br />

some genes do influence viability in only one gender; but these<br />

genes are exceptional. The genes that influence fertility, by contrast,<br />

mainly differ in male and female bodies. Genes influencing female<br />

fertility are expressed in the ovaries and influence oogenesis; these<br />

genes are switched off in male bodies. Some explanation other than<br />

the simple dominance theory given here may be needed for cases of<br />

sterility that fit Haldane’s rule. Also, the theory as given here works<br />

for the kind of X chromosome dosage compensation that is found in<br />

fruitflies, but the theory needs to be extended to explain mammals.<br />

Therefore, the Dobzhansky–Muller theory can be used to explain,<br />

at least in part, the longstanding and well documented<br />

generalization known as Haldane’s rule. Haldane’s rule has been a<br />

topic of active research recently, particularly since a classic<br />

experiment by Coyne (1985). Haldane’s rule has proved to be an<br />

excellent route to understanding the genetic changes that cause<br />

speciation, or at least that cause postzygotic isolation.<br />

Figure 14.8b, not Figure 14.8a. Postzygotic isolation evolves faster in the heterogametic<br />

gender. But what is the explanation for Haldane’s rule? The question has been the topic<br />

of active research recently, and many detailed genetic hypotheses have been tested.<br />

Box 14.1 describes how the basic Dobzhansky–Muller theory can explain Haldane’s<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!