02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

348 PART 4 / <strong>Evolution</strong> and Diversity<br />

(a) Bald eagle<br />

(b) Golden eagle<br />

Species are formally defined and<br />

practically recognized by phenetic<br />

characters<br />

Adult<br />

Adult<br />

Figure 13.1<br />

(a) Adult bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and (b) adult<br />

golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), seen from underneath. The<br />

species can be distinguished by their pattern of white coloration.<br />

13.1 In practice species are recognized and defined<br />

by phenetic characters<br />

Biologists almost universally agree that the species is a fundamental natural unit. When<br />

biologists report their research, they identify their subject matter at the species level and<br />

communicate it by a Linnaean binomial such as Haliaeetus leucocephalus (bald eagle)<br />

or Drosophila melanogaster (fruitfly). However, biologists have not been able to agree<br />

on exactly how species should be defined in the abstract. The controversy is theoretical,<br />

not practical. No one doubts how particular species are defined in practice.<br />

Taxonomists practically define species by means of morphological or phenetic characters.<br />

1 If one group of organisms consistently differs from other organisms, it will be<br />

defined as a separate species. The formal definition of the species will be in terms of<br />

characters that can be used to recognize members of that species. The taxonomist who<br />

describes the species will have examined specimens of it and of related species, looking<br />

for characters that are present in specimens of the species to be described, and absent<br />

from other closely related species. These are the characters used to define the species.<br />

Almost any phenetic character may end up being useful in the practical recognition<br />

of species. Figure 13.1 for example shows the adults of the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)<br />

and the golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), seen from below. A bird guide will<br />

1 Phenetic characters are all the observable, or measurable, characters of an organism, including microscopic<br />

and physiological characters that may be hard work in practice to observe or measure. Morphological characters<br />

are characters of the shape or observable form of the whole organism or a large part of it. Behavioral and<br />

physiological characters are part of the phenetic description of an organism, but not part of its morphology.<br />

However, taxonomic descriptions are usually made from dead specimens in a museum, and the phenetic characters<br />

that are specified in taxonomic descriptions are usually morphological characters. The words “phenetic”<br />

and “morphological” are therefore practically almost interchangeable here. Also, the word “phenotypic” could<br />

be used instead of “phenetic.”<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!