02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Present<br />

~540 Myr<br />

~1,200 Myr<br />

Echinoderms<br />

Chordates<br />

Annelids<br />

Several hypotheses exist to explain<br />

the Cambrian explosion<br />

Mollusks<br />

Arthropods<br />

Invisible ancestors<br />

Fossils deposited<br />

Origin of hard parts<br />

CHAPTER 18 / The History of Life 537<br />

Figure 18.6<br />

Reconciling fossil and molecular evidence on the timing of<br />

animal evolution. The main animal groups could have diverged<br />

around 1,200 million years ago, as the molecular evidence<br />

suggests, but been invisible in the fossil record until the origin<br />

of hard parts around 540 million years ago. The fossil invisibility<br />

of animals between 1,200 and 540 million years ago could be due<br />

to the animals being rare and soft. The time of proliferation in the<br />

fossil record and the time or origin of a group would then not be<br />

the same.<br />

were too rare or fragile, or in the wrong place, to leave fossils (Figure 18.6). In Cooper &<br />

Fortey’s (1998) image, a “phylogenetic fuse” preceded the Cambrian explosion.<br />

Why should there have been a long period a 500 million years or more a when<br />

ancestors of the modern animal phyla existed but no fossils were deposited? The<br />

Cambrian explosion is a fossil event, and probably marks the time of origin of hard<br />

parts. Animals with hard skeletons or shells leave fossils much more often than animals<br />

with only soft parts. But if hard parts originated about 540 million years ago, that raises<br />

the question of why hard parts suddenly became advantageous in so many groups at<br />

about the same time.<br />

Predators in general is one hypothesis and visually hunting predators in particular is<br />

a second hypothesis. After predators evolved, hard parts became advantageous for<br />

defensive reasons. Another factor is that oxygen levels may have increased towards the<br />

end of the Precambrian. This may have been caused by an increase in plant a that is,<br />

phytoplankton a productivity (Knoll & Carroll 1999). The higher plant production<br />

(if it occurred then) would have supported a greater mass and diversity of animals.<br />

The greater quantity of potential prey could have created an opportunity leading to the<br />

evolution of predators.<br />

The “snowball Earth” hypothesis suggests a further environmental factor that could<br />

have been at work. For at least some of the period before the Cambrian, the Earth may<br />

have been almost completely covered with ice and glaciers. Life would have been rare,<br />

confined to areas near hot springs or ocean vents, or small localities where enough<br />

ice had melted to allow sunlight through and photosynthesis to occur. This would<br />

help explain the paucity of fossils before the Cambrian. Moreover, the ancestors of<br />

arthropods, mollusks, and chordates would then have been tiny creatures, small<br />

enough to have been supported by the very limited ecological productivity.<br />

The Cambrian explosion is the subject of intense research at present. Biologists<br />

and paleontologists are studying just how suddenly the fossil event was: maybe it was<br />

less explosive than Figure 18.5 shows. Others are studying the molecular evidence,<br />

with further molecules and new calibration procedures. If, as seems likely, some<br />

major evolutionary event did occur around 540 million years ago, the big question<br />

is what caused it? The hypotheses at present are looking at external environmental

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!