02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Phylogenetic tests for sympatric<br />

speciation have recently been<br />

devised<br />

CHAPTER 14 / Speciation 413<br />

How general a process is sympatric speciation by host shifts? A definite answer cannot<br />

be given as it has not even been confirmed that sympatric speciation ever does take<br />

place by host shifts. But there are interesting hints that the process might be important<br />

(Section 22.3.3, p. 620). Several phytophagous insect taxa have undergone extensive<br />

phylogenetic radiations on plant host taxa. There are, for example, about 750 species of<br />

fig wasps, and each breeds on its own species of fig; in Britain alone there are 300 species<br />

of leaf miners in the dipteran family Agromyzidae, and 70% of them each feed on only<br />

one plant species. It is easy to imagine how these groups could have radiated from a single<br />

common ancestor, as successive new species arose by host shifts like the one taking<br />

place in the apple maggot fly in the USA. If phytophagous insect species consisted of an<br />

occasional odd species scattered through the phylogeny of insects, and feeding on unrelated<br />

kinds of food plants, the process would probably have not been operating; but the<br />

existence of whole large taxa of host plant-specific phytophages does suggest that speciation<br />

by host shifts could have contributed to their diversification.<br />

14.10.3 Phylogenies can be used to test whether speciation has been<br />

sympatric or allopatric<br />

Direct attempts to test the theory of sympatric speciation, such as in Rhagoletis<br />

pomonella, are only one way to test whether sympatric speciation occurs. Recently, a<br />

new kind of evidence has been put forward for sympatric speciation. The evidence suggests<br />

that sympatric speciation occurs, but tells us nothing about how it occurs. The<br />

evidence comes from the shape of phylogenetic trees, and was first obtained for cichlid<br />

fish in African lakes (Schliewen et al. 1994). As we saw (Section 13.3.3, p. 357), many<br />

species of cichlid fish have evolved in the East African lakes. Did they originate by sympatric,<br />

or allopatric, speciation?<br />

Figure 14.14 shows the argument. If a new species arises by allopatric speciation, its<br />

nearest relative will usually live in a different geographic area, such as in a nearby lake or<br />

river. If the species evolved sympatrically, the nearest related species will usually live in<br />

the same lake. In the case of a number of fish species, including the African cichlids, the<br />

phylogenetic evidence supports sympatric speciation. Similar studies for other taxa<br />

usually suggest allopatric speciation (Barraclough & Vogler 2001).<br />

In conclusion, few biologists would rule out non-allopatric mechanisms of<br />

speciation. Speciation probably occurs non-allopatrically, though it may only be rare.<br />

Sympatric and parapatric speciation are more controversial theories than allopatric<br />

speciation, except for special cases such as hybrid speciation in plants, because they are<br />

not supported by such an impressive range of evidence.<br />

14.11 The influence of sexual selection in speciation is one<br />

current trend in research<br />

We can finish this chapter by looking briefly at two big themes in current, and possibly<br />

future, research on speciation. One is the possibility that sexual selection is important.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!