02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Mean population fitness ( w ) –<br />

0 p'<br />

1<br />

Frequency of A allele ( p)<br />

Random drift may take a population<br />

away from a local peak<br />

Wright’s shifting balance theory is<br />

concerned with evolution on<br />

complex adaptive topographies<br />

CHAPTER 8 / Two-locus and Multilocus Population Genetics 217<br />

Figure 8.9<br />

A two-peaked fitness surface with local and global maxima.<br />

Natural selection will take a population with gene frequency<br />

p′ towards the local peak, away from the peak with highest<br />

average fitness.<br />

Figure 8.7a), the organisms with the better genotype will also be better adapted. But<br />

when fitness is frequency dependent or when group and individual adaptations conflict<br />

(Chapter 11), the maximum of mean population fitness may not correspond to the best<br />

adaptation.)<br />

Wright was interested in how evolution could overcome the tendency of natural<br />

selection to become stuck at local fitness peaks. When fitness peaks correspond to<br />

optimal adaptations, the question is relevant to the evolution of adaptation; but when<br />

they do not, the question still has a technical interest in population genetics. Wright<br />

suggested that random drift could play a creative role. Drift will tend to make the population<br />

gene frequencies “explore” around their present position. The population could,<br />

by drift, move from a local peak to explore the valleys of the fitness surface. Once it had<br />

explored to the foot of another hill, natural selection could start it climbing uphill on<br />

the other side. If this process of drift and selection were repeated over and over again<br />

with different valleys and hills on the adaptive topography, a population would be<br />

more likely to reach the global peak than if it was under the exclusive control of the<br />

locally maximizing process of natural selection.<br />

Wright’s full shifting balance theory includes more than just selection and drift<br />

within a local population. He also suggested that populations would be subdivided into<br />

many small local populations, and drift and selection would go on in each. The large<br />

number of subpopulations would multiply the chance that one of them would find the<br />

global peak. If members of a subpopulation at the highest peak were better adapted,<br />

they could produce more offspring and more emigrants to the other subpopulations.<br />

Those other subpopulations would then be taken over by the superior immigrant<br />

genotypes. Thus the whole species would evolve to the higher peak. Wright’s theory is<br />

thus an attempt at a comprehensive, realistic model of evolution. Everything is<br />

included: multiple loci, fitness interactions, selection within and between populations,<br />

drift, and migration. (The theory of adaptive peaks is also relevant to speciation:<br />

Section 14.4.4, p. 394.)<br />

The question of how important the shifting balance process is in evolution is long<br />

standing, dating back to Wright’s publications in the 1930s. Coyne et al. (1997) recently<br />

reopened the controversy, arguing that we have no good reason to think that the shifting<br />

balance process has contributed much to evolution. The full controversy has looked<br />

at many topics. Here are four of them.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!