02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

102 PART 2 / <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Genetics<br />

Natural populations may or may not<br />

fit the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium<br />

5.4 We can test, by simple observation, whether genotypes<br />

in a population are at the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium<br />

The Hardy–Weinberg theorem depends on three main assumptions: no selection,<br />

random mating, and large population size. In a natural population, any of these could<br />

be false; we cannot assume that natural populations will be at the Hardy–Weinberg<br />

equilibrium. In practice, we can find out whether a population is at the Hardy–<br />

Weinberg equilibrium for a locus simply by counting the genotype frequencies.<br />

From those frequencies, we first calculate the gene frequencies; then, if the observed<br />

homozygote frequencies equal the square of their gene frequencies, the population is in<br />

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. If they do not, it is not.<br />

The MN blood group system in humans is a good example, because the three<br />

genotypes are distinct and the genes have reasonably high frequencies in human<br />

populations. Three phenotypes, M, MN, and N are produced by three genotypes (MM,<br />

MN, NN) and two alleles at one locus. The phenotypes of the MN group, like the better<br />

known ABO group, are recognized by reactions with antisera. The antisera are made<br />

by injecting blood into a rabbit, which then makes an antiserum to the type of blood<br />

that was injected. If the rabbit has been injected with M-type human blood, it produces<br />

Table 5.2<br />

The frequencies of the MM, MN, and NN blood groups in three American populations. The figures for expected proportions and<br />

numbers have been rounded.<br />

Population MM MN NN Total Frequency M Frequency N<br />

African Americans Observed number 79 138 61 278<br />

Expected proportion 0.283 0.499 0.219 0.532 0.468<br />

Expected number 78.8 138.7 60.8<br />

European Americans Observed number 1,787 3,039 1,303 6,129<br />

Expected proportion 0.292 0.497 0.211 0.54 0.46<br />

Expected number 1,787.2 3,044.9 1,296.9<br />

Native Americans Observed number 123 72 10 205<br />

Expected proportion 0.602 0.348 0.05 0.776 0.224<br />

Expected number 123.3 71.4 10.3<br />

Specimen calculation for African Americans: Frequency of M allele = 79 + ( 1 /2 × 138) = 0.532 = p<br />

Frequency of N allele = 61 + ( 1 /2 × 138) = 0.468 = q<br />

Expected proportion of MM = p 2 = (0.532) 2 = 0.283<br />

Expected proportion of MN = 2pq = 2(0.532) (0.468) = 0.499<br />

Expected proportion of NN = q 2 = (0.468) 2 = 0.219<br />

Expected numbers = expected proportion × total number (n) Expected number of MM = p 2 n = 0.283 × 278 = 78.8<br />

Expected number of MN = 2pqn = 0.499 × 278 = 138.7<br />

Expected number of NN = q 2 n = 0.219 × 278 = 60.8<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!