02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

. . . by experiment, ...<br />

. . . and by the comparative method<br />

CHAPTER 10 / Adaptive Explanation 271<br />

Table 10.1<br />

The wing stripe of some butterflies was painted over, and controls were painted with<br />

transparent paint that did not affect their appearance. The number with intact wings at<br />

different times after the treatment was measured. The frequency distributions are not<br />

significantly different. From Silbergleid et al. (1980).<br />

Age at Painted butterflies Controls<br />

capture<br />

(week) n % n %<br />

0 81 83.5 88 90.7<br />

1 14 14.4 6 6.2<br />

2 2 2.1 2 2.1<br />

3 0 0 1 1.0<br />

4 0 0 0 0<br />

5 0 0 0 0<br />

construction engineering is used for shell thickness in a mollusk: the costs of building a<br />

thicker shell have to be weighed against the benefits of reduced breakage, by wave<br />

action or predators. This sort of research can be carried out at all levels, from the simple<br />

and qualitative through to sophisticated algebraic modeling.<br />

Stage three is to test the hypothesis’s predictions. Three main methods are available.<br />

One is simply to see whether the actual form of an organ (or whatever character is<br />

under investigation) matches the hypothetical prediction; if it does not, the hypothesis<br />

is wrong somehow.<br />

A second method is to do experiments. It is only useful if the organ, or behavior pattern,<br />

can be altered experimentally. Almost any hypothesis about adaptation will predict<br />

that some specified form of an organ will enable its bearer to survive better than<br />

some other forms, but the alternatives are not always feasible. We cannot, for example,<br />

make an experimental pig with wings to see whether flight would be advantageous.<br />

When they are possible, experiments are a powerful means of testing ideas about adaptation.<br />

Animal coloration, for instance, has been studied in this way. Color patterns in<br />

some butterfly species are believed to act as camouflage by “breaking up” the butterfly’s<br />

outline. Silberglied et al. (1980), working at the Smithsonian Tropical Research<br />

Institution at Panama, experimentally painted out the wing stripes of the butterfly<br />

Anartia fatima. The butterflies with their wing stripes painted out showed similar levels<br />

of wing damage (which is produced by unsuccessful bird attacks) and survived equally<br />

as well as control butterflies (Table 10.1); the wing stripes, therefore, are not in fact<br />

adaptations to increase survival. They may have some other signaling or reproductive<br />

function, though that would need to be tested by further experiments.<br />

The comparative method is the third method of studying adaptation. It can be used if<br />

the hypothesis predicts that some kinds of species should have different forms of an<br />

adaptation from other kinds of species. Darwin’s classic study of the relation between<br />

sexual dimorphism and mating system is an example we shall discuss below. Some

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!