02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

..<br />

Adaptive topographies can be used<br />

to think about abstract evolutionary<br />

questions<br />

Figure 8.8<br />

Fitness surface for two loci.<br />

(a) A combination of the<br />

patterns in Figures 8.7a and<br />

b: there is a heterozygous<br />

advantage at locus A and one<br />

allele has a higher fitness<br />

than the other at locus B.<br />

(b) A two-locus fitness surface<br />

with two peaks.<br />

CHAPTER 8 / Two-locus and Multilocus Population Genetics 215<br />

fitness is highest at the equilibrium gene frequency given by the standard equation<br />

(Section 5.12.1, p. 123). Mean fitness declines either side of the equilibrium gene frequency,<br />

where more of the unfavorable homozygotes will be dying each generation<br />

than at the equilibrium (Figure 8.7b). The graph is also called a fitness surface.<br />

In these two cases, natural selection carries the population to the gene frequency<br />

where mean fitness is at a maximum. With one favorable allele, the maximum mean<br />

fitness is where the allele is fixed a and natural selection will act to fix the allele. With<br />

heterozygous advantage, the maximum mean fitness is where the smallest number of<br />

homozygotes are dying each generation a and natural selection drives the population<br />

to an equilibrium where the amount of homozygote death is minimized.<br />

A question of interest in theoretical population genetics is whether natural selection<br />

always drives the population to the state at which the mean fitness is the maximum<br />

possible. Frequency-dependent selection (Section 5.13, p. 127) is a case in which natural<br />

selection may not act to maximize mean fitness. When a polymorphism is maintained<br />

by frequency-dependent selection, the fitness of each genotype is highest when it is<br />

rare. But when a genotype is rare, natural selection acts to increase its frequency,<br />

making it less rare. The effect of selection can then be to reduce mean fitness.<br />

If natural selection does not always maximize mean fitness, that opens up a further a<br />

and still unanswered a theoretical question of whether natural selection does act to<br />

maximize some other function, but we shall not pursue that question here. Whatever<br />

the answer to it, natural selection does still maximize simple mean fitness in many<br />

cases. For many purposes, we can safely think of natural selection as a hill-climbing<br />

process, by analogy with the hills in the adaptive topography (Figure 8.7).<br />

Now consider a second locus. Selection can be going on here too, and the fitness<br />

surface for the two loci might look like Figure 8.8. Figure 8.8a shows a simple case in<br />

which one locus has heterozygous advantage and the other has a single favored allele.<br />

The idea of an adaptive topography can be extended to as many loci as interact to determine<br />

an organism’s fitness, but further loci have to be imagined, rather than drawn, on<br />

two-dimensional paper.<br />

Mean fitness<br />

(a) (b)<br />

0 10 1<br />

allele of Frequency<br />

Frequency of A allele<br />

B Mean fitness<br />

0 1 0<br />

1<br />

allele of Frequency<br />

Frequency of A allele<br />

B

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!