02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

106 PART 2 / <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Genetics<br />

The model predicts the rate of<br />

change in gene frequency as the<br />

superior gene is fixed<br />

Mean fitness = p 2 + 2pq + q 2 (1 − s) = 1 − sq 2 (5.3)<br />

Dividing by mean fitness in the algebraic case is the same as dividing by the population<br />

size after selection in the numerical example. Notice that now the adult genotype frequencies<br />

are not in Hardy–Weinberg ratios. If we tried to predict the proportion of aa<br />

from q 2 , as in the MN blood group (Section 5.4), we should fail. The frequency of aa is<br />

q 2 (1 − s)/1 − sq 2 , not q 2 .<br />

What is the relation between p′ and p? Remember that the frequency of the gene A at<br />

any time is equal to the frequency of AA plus half the frequency of Aa. We have just<br />

listed those frequencies in the adults after selection:<br />

p2+ pq p<br />

p′<br />

= =<br />

1−sq 1−sq<br />

2 2<br />

(5.4)<br />

(remember p + q = 1, and therefore p 2 + pq = p(p + q) = p.) The denominator 1 − sq 2 is<br />

less than 1, because s is positive, so p′ is greater than p: selection is increasing the frequency<br />

of the A gene. We can now derive a result for ∆p, the change in gene frequency<br />

in one generation. The algebra looks like this.<br />

p<br />

∆p = p′ − p =<br />

1 − sq<br />

2<br />

p − p + spq<br />

=<br />

1 − sq2<br />

spq2<br />

=<br />

1 − sq<br />

2<br />

− p<br />

2<br />

(5.5)<br />

For example, if p = q = 0.5 and aa individuals have fitness 0.9 compared with AA and Aa<br />

individuals (s = 0.1) then the change in gene frequency to the next generation will be<br />

(0.1 × 0.5 × (0.5) 2 )/(1 − 0.1 × (0.5) 2 ) = 0.0128; the frequency of A will therefore increase<br />

to 0.5128.<br />

We can use this result to calculate the change in gene frequency between successive<br />

generations for any selection coefficient (s) and any gene frequency. The result in this<br />

simple case is that the A gene will increase in frequency until it is eventually fixed (that<br />

is, has a frequency of 1). Table 5.4 illustrates how gene frequencies change when selection<br />

acts against a recessive allele, for each of two selection coefficients. There are two<br />

points to notice in the table. One is the obvious one that with a higher selection<br />

coefficient against the aa genotype, the A gene increases in frequency more rapidly. The<br />

other is the more interesting observation that the increase in the frequency of A slows<br />

down when it becomes common, and it would take a long time finally to eliminate the a<br />

gene. This is because the a gene is recessive. When a is rare it is almost always found in<br />

Aa individuals, who are selectively equivalent to AA individuals: selection can no<br />

longer “see” the a gene, and it becomes more and more difficult to eliminate them.<br />

Logically, selection cannot eliminate the one final a gene from the population, because<br />

if there is only one copy of the gene it must be in a heterozygote.<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!