02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tertiary<br />

Lower Danian<br />

Cretaceous<br />

Upper Maastrichtian<br />

Tri. Jur. Cret. Dan. Pal. Eoc. Olig. Mio. Pli. Rec.<br />

(m)<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

(a) Brachiopods<br />

32<br />

31<br />

30<br />

29<br />

28<br />

27<br />

26<br />

25<br />

24<br />

23<br />

22<br />

21<br />

20<br />

19<br />

18<br />

17<br />

16<br />

15<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

10<br />

8 9<br />

6 7<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

(c) Bivalves<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

10 11<br />

9<br />

19 20<br />

18<br />

12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

24 25<br />

21 22 23<br />

Figure 23.3<br />

The mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous affected all the<br />

main taxa, but the evidence about whether they all went extinct<br />

suddenly at the same time is controversial. Here are four<br />

examples. (a) Brachiopods from Nye Kløv, Denmark. These<br />

extinctions look synchronous. It has been argued that there<br />

was a sedimentary hiatus here; others disagree, but note the<br />

gap at the base of the Tertiary. (b) Dinosaurs from Hells Creek,<br />

Montana. These look gradual. It has been argued that the<br />

gradual extinctions, and persistence of dinosaurs into the<br />

Tertiary, is due to secondary reworking of the fossils, and the<br />

real extinction pattern is sudden and synchronous at the end<br />

of the Cretaceous (see Smit & van der Kaars 1984; Sheehan et al.<br />

1991). (c) Bivalves from Stevens Klint, Denmark. These look<br />

synchronous. It has been argued that the sudden extinctions<br />

26<br />

35<br />

33 34<br />

28 29 30 31 32<br />

27<br />

Stratigraphic column (m)<br />

0<br />

20<br />

40<br />

60<br />

80<br />

100<br />

120<br />

140<br />

160<br />

180<br />

200<br />

220<br />

(d) Ammonites<br />

Time (Myr)<br />

66.7<br />

67<br />

68<br />

69<br />

70<br />

71<br />

72<br />

73<br />

74<br />

75<br />

76<br />

77<br />

Maastrichtian<br />

Campanian<br />

(b) Dinosaurs<br />

0 40 80<br />

Dinosaur genera<br />

surviving (%)<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18<br />

are only apparent, being due to a gap in the sedimentary record,<br />

but most students of the site accept that the sedimentary record<br />

is continuous and that the extinctions are real. (d) Ammonites<br />

from the Zumaya section, northern Spain. The results are<br />

shown for two seasons of collecting. Note the improved<br />

evidence in the larger dataset (dashed lines) for synchronous<br />

extinctions at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary. The nonsynchronous<br />

pattern in the earlier data (solid lines) might<br />

be due to incomplete evidence and the real pattern is<br />

synchronous. (100 ft ≈ 39.5 m.) Redrawn, by permission of the<br />

publishers: (a) from Surlyk & Johansen (1984), (b) from Sloan<br />

et al. (1986), (c) from Alvarez et al. (1984), and (d) from Ward<br />

(1990). (a–c) © 1984, 1986 American Association for the<br />

Advancement of Science.<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!