02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

388 PART 4 / <strong>Evolution</strong> and Diversity<br />

Pollen fertility (%)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0 0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Geographically distant populations<br />

have often evolved isolating<br />

barriers<br />

Ring species are striking examples<br />

Distance between parental strains (miles)<br />

Figure 14.4<br />

Postzygotic isolation between populations of the Californian<br />

flower Streptanthus glandulosus. Flowers taken from different<br />

populations were crossed, and produced hybrids. The amount of<br />

good pollen produced by the hybrid offspring was measured and<br />

expressed as a percentage of the pollen produced by the parents.<br />

Hybrids from more distant crosses tended to be less fertile.<br />

(50 miles ≈ 80 km.) Redrawn, by permission of the publisher,<br />

from Kruckeberg (1957).<br />

results show that crosses between members of nearby populations are usually fertile,<br />

but fertility decreases for crosses between more distant populations.<br />

Research of this kind has been mainly done with plants, and has measured<br />

postzygotic isolation. The usual result is that some crosses show postzygotic isolation<br />

while others do not, and that more distant populations are more strongly isolated.<br />

Some research of this kind has also been done on animals, and on prezygotic isolation.<br />

Korol et al. (2000), for example, showed that fruitflies from different slopes of Mount<br />

Carmel in Israel preferentially mated with flies from their own locality. In all, we have<br />

extensive evidence that isolating barriers tend to evolve between geographically distant<br />

populations of a species in nature.<br />

The members of distant populations normally have to be brought together in the lab<br />

by an experimenter in order to measure the amount of reproductive isolation between<br />

them. They do not usually naturally meet up. However, there is one exceptional circumstance<br />

in which members of “distant” populations come together in nature: this is<br />

the phenomenon of ring species (Section 3.5, p. 50). In California, the salamander<br />

Ensatina eschscholtzii spread down from the north, and sent separate colonizing populations<br />

down the coast and inland to the east of the central valley (Jackman & Wake<br />

1994). These two lines of populations meet up in the south, in San Diego County,<br />

where they are reproductively isolated and effectively two species (Wake et al. 1986).<br />

The two reproductively isolated populations, or species, in the south are connected by a<br />

continuously interbreeding series of populations looping round north California and<br />

Oregon.<br />

Ring species provide dramatic evidence that normal genetic divergence within one<br />

species can build up to a sufficient level to generate two species. We do not see it, in<br />

most cases, because the genetic extremes within a species are living far apart. But in a<br />

ring species the extremes exist side by side and the resulting reproductive isolation is<br />

directly observable in nature. Examples are rare because the populations of a species are<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!