02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

214 PART 2 / <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Genetics<br />

. . . and neutral linkage<br />

disequilibrium are all possible<br />

Figure 8.7<br />

A fitness surface, or adaptive<br />

topography, is a graph of the<br />

mean fitness of the population<br />

as a function of gene, or in some<br />

cases genotype, frequency. (a) If<br />

allele A (frequency p) has higher<br />

fitness than a (frequency 1 − p),<br />

mean population fitness simply<br />

increases as the frequency of<br />

A increases. (b) With<br />

heterozygous advantage<br />

(fitnesses of genotypes<br />

AA : Aa : aa are 1 − s :1:<br />

1 − t) mean population fitness<br />

increases to a peak at the<br />

intermediate frequency of<br />

A at which the proportion of<br />

heterozygotes is the maximum<br />

possible.<br />

on average have lower fitness than if linkage equilibrium existed between the A and B<br />

loci because the increase in the A′B haplotype reduces the proportion of B/b heterozygotes.<br />

Natural selection will favor recombinant individuals that do not have the<br />

A′B haplotype.<br />

A third possibility is for linkage disequilibrium to be selectively neutral. An example<br />

of this was provided by the hitch-hiking of an allele at a neutral polymorphic locus with<br />

a selectively advantageous mutant at a linked locus. While the mutant is being fixed,<br />

linkage disequilibrium temporarily builds up between it and the alleles it happens to be<br />

linked to at nearby loci. It disappears when the mutant reaches a frequency of one.<br />

The distinction between advantageous and disadvantageous linkage disequilibrium<br />

is crucial to understanding one of the major problems of evolutionary biology:<br />

why recombination, and sexual reproduction, exists. We look at that problem in<br />

Sections 12.1–12.3 (pp. 314–27). We finish this chapter by looking at another influental<br />

multilocus population genetic concept a one that is so influential that it is part of the<br />

language of evolutionary biology.<br />

8.12 Wright invented the influential concept of an adaptive<br />

topography<br />

Wright’s idea of an adaptive topography (or adaptive landscape) is particularly useful for<br />

thinking about complex genetic systems; but it is easier to begin with the simplest case.<br />

This is for a single genetic locus. The topography is a graph of mean population fitness<br />

(d) against gene frequency (Figure 8.7). (Adaptive topographies can also be drawn for<br />

fitness in relation to genotype frequencies. They can even be drawn with phenotypic<br />

variables on the x-axis; see, for example, Raup’s analysis of shell shape, in Figure 10.9<br />

(p. 278). Figure 10.4 (p. 267), used in Fisher’s theory of adaptation, is also similar.) We<br />

have repeatedly met the concept of mean fitness; it is equal to the sum of the fitnesses of<br />

each genotype in the population, each multiplied by its proportion in the population.<br />

In a case in which the genotypes containing one of the alleles have higher fitnesses than<br />

those of the alternative, the mean fitness of the population simply increases as the<br />

frequency of the superior allele increases and reaches a maximum when the gene is<br />

fixed (Figure 8.7a). That is fairly trivial. When there is heterozygous advantage, mean<br />

Mean population fitness ( w ) –<br />

(a) (b)<br />

0 1 0 1<br />

Frequency of A allele<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!