02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

414 PART 4 / <strong>Evolution</strong> and Diversity<br />

Figure 14.14<br />

Phylogenetic test between<br />

sympatric and allopatric<br />

speciation. The test has been<br />

used most for lake-dwelling fish<br />

species. (a) With allopatric<br />

speciation, new species evolve<br />

in separate lakes and for any<br />

one species, its closest relative is<br />

predicted to live in a different<br />

lake. (b) With sympatric<br />

speciation, new species evolve<br />

alongside their ancestors.<br />

Related species are predicted to<br />

live in the same lake. Evidence<br />

for some fish species, including<br />

African lake cichlids, shows the<br />

phylogenetic pattern expected<br />

with sympatric speciation.<br />

Sexual selection may contribute to<br />

the evolution of prezygotic isolation<br />

Time<br />

Phylogeny<br />

Sp. 1<br />

Sp. 1<br />

(a) Allopatric speciation (b) Sympatric speciation<br />

Lake A Lake B Lake A Lake B<br />

Sp. 2<br />

Evolves<br />

into new<br />

species<br />

Colonizes<br />

Colonizes<br />

Sp. 4<br />

Sp. 3<br />

Sp. 3<br />

Lake A Lake B Lake A<br />

Sexual selection is discussed in Section 12.4 (p. 327) and has two main components:<br />

male competition and female choice. The mechanisms that females use to the choose<br />

mates may influence speciation because they can contribute to, or even wholly determine,<br />

prezygotic isolation.<br />

The way natural selection acts on mate choice may help explain the evolution of<br />

prezygotic isolation in both allopatric and sympatric populations. Consider again those<br />

experiments in which some populations of a species are allowed to evolve in two environmental<br />

conditions, such as a diet of maltose or of starch (see Figure 14.2). We saw<br />

that prezygotic isolation evolves as a by-product and its genetic basis may be pleiotropy<br />

or hitch-hiking. Now let us think some more about how natural selection will work in<br />

each experimental population. On a starch medium, selection favors individuals who<br />

can eat, digest, and thrive on starch. But it also favors female flies who choose as mates<br />

those males that are better than average at living on a starch diet. Over time, females<br />

may evolve a preference for males with adaptations for life on starch. In the maltose<br />

population, females evolve preferences for males who are adapted for life on maltose.<br />

Then, at the end of the experiment we give females a choice of males and find the<br />

females from the starch lines prefer males from starch lines.<br />

One way of seeing this argument is as providing an explanation for pleiotropy.<br />

Prezygotic isolation evolves as a by-product when the character concerned with ecological<br />

adaptation happens, perhaps coincidentally, also to be concerned with mate choice<br />

Sp. 1<br />

Sp. 3<br />

Sp. 1 Sp. 2 Sp. 3 Sp. 4<br />

Lake A Lake B<br />

1 4 3 2 1 2 3 4<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!