02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

(a)<br />

Time<br />

Character<br />

Plant<br />

Insect<br />

Figure 22.4<br />

Sequential evolution means that change in one lineage selects<br />

for change in the other lineage, but not vice versa. Sequential<br />

evolution would apply to plants and insects if plant evolution<br />

influences insects, but insect evolution has little influence<br />

on plants. The pattern of change in (a) lineages, and<br />

. . . with cospeciation ...<br />

. . . or sequential evolution ...<br />

(b)<br />

CHAPTER 22 / Coevolution 619<br />

Plant phylogeny Insect phylogeny<br />

(b) phylogenies differs from strict coevolution (compare with<br />

Figure 22.2). (a) Changes in plants coevolve with changes in<br />

insects, but changes (for some reason other than changes in<br />

plants) in insects do not cause changes in plants. (b) When<br />

plants speciate, so do insects, but when insects speciate it has<br />

no effect on plants.<br />

become geographically separated from each other. Each subpopulation of milkweed<br />

might well have its own subpopulation of Tetraopes.<br />

The two milkweed populations might diverge as they coevolved with their local<br />

insects. One population of milkweeds might evolve one set of cardenolides, while the<br />

other population evolved a different set of poisons. Each local beetle population would<br />

evolve detoxification mechanisms appropriate for the local milkweeds. Reproductive<br />

isolation would probably evolve as a by-product, by the classic process of allopatric<br />

speciation (Section 14.3, p. 383). After a while, the two forms of plant might meet up<br />

but be reproductively isolated because of the genetic differences that had built up<br />

between the two.<br />

Alternatively, cophylogenies can arise by sequential evolution. In sequential evolution,<br />

changes in one of the two taxa lead to changes in the other, but not the other way<br />

round. For instance, some biologists have argued that plants influence the evolution<br />

of insects, but insects have less effect on evolution in plants (Figure 22.4). This could be<br />

for a number of reasons. One is that many insects eat only one type of plant, whereas<br />

plants are eaten by many insects. When a plant changes, its insects will all have to<br />

change to keep up; but when one insect species changes, it alone will exert only a small<br />

selective pressure on its food plant. Sequential evolution may result in imperfect<br />

matches in the phylogenies of the two taxa (Figure 22.4b). In principle, the shape of the<br />

phylogenies can be used to distinguish sequential evolution from coevolution. However,<br />

cophylogenies are rarely perfectly matched, and many factors can influence the<br />

degree of match between the phylogenies of two taxa. It is statistically difficult to distinguish<br />

real coevolution from sequential evolution. The extent to which insect–plant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!