02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

..<br />

Less interbreeding between species More interbreeding between species<br />

+0.80<br />

+0.60<br />

+0.40<br />

+0.20<br />

0.0<br />

–0.20<br />

–0.40<br />

–0.60<br />

–0.80<br />

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18<br />

Generation<br />

Evidence from biogeography ...<br />

. . . is consistent with reinforcement<br />

...<br />

CHAPTER 14 / Speciation 403<br />

Figure 14.9<br />

Artificial selection in female Drosophila pseudoobscura for<br />

increased (low isolation, green line) and decreased (high isolation,<br />

black line) tendencies to mate with male D. persimilis. The y-axis<br />

is an index of frequency of mating with a member of the other<br />

species (heterospecific mating). When the index is positive,<br />

females are more likely to mate with heterospecific males than<br />

are control females; when it is negative they are less likely to.<br />

Redrawn, by permission of the publisher, from Kessler (1966).<br />

character displacement.) For example, Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae are two<br />

closely related species of cactus-eating fruitfly that coexist in Sonora, Mexico. But elsewhere<br />

in the southwest, each species can be found living without the other: D. mojavensis,<br />

for example, lives in Baja California where D. arizonae is absent, and D. arizonae<br />

lives in other regions of Mexico without D. mojavensis (Figure 14.10).<br />

The key result concerns the amount of prezygotic isolation between the species<br />

in sympatric and allopatric populations. When a male of one species is put with a<br />

female of the other, they are less likely to mate than are a pair from the same species.<br />

Wasserman & Koepfer (1977) measured the degree of mating discrimination in populations<br />

taken both from where the two species co-occur and from where only one of<br />

the species lives. They found that discrimination against potential mates from the<br />

other species was stronger in the flies from regions where both species are found<br />

(Figure 14.10c).<br />

The result is an example of character displacement. Character displacement occurs<br />

when two species differ more in sympatry than in allopatry. The term can refer to<br />

any character, and D. mojavensis and D. arizonae show reproductive character displacement,<br />

or to be exact character displacement for prezygotic reproductive isolation.<br />

These two species are one example among several in which this result has been<br />

found.<br />

One interpretation of reproductive character displacement is that prezygotic isolation<br />

has been reinforced in sympatry. When the two species do not encounter each<br />

other (that is, allopatrically), natural selection will not have favored discrimination<br />

against mates from the other species. In sympatry, where interbreeding may produce<br />

hybrids of reduced fitness, selection will have favored mechanisms to prevent crossbreeding.<br />

Reinforcement has acted to increase prezygotic isolation only where the two<br />

species coexist.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!