02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

224 PART 2 / <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Genetics<br />

Figure 9.1<br />

Parents with larger than average<br />

beaks produce offspring with<br />

larger than average beaks in<br />

Geospiza fortis on Daphne<br />

Major, showing that beak size<br />

is inherited. Results are shown<br />

here for 2 years in the 1970s.<br />

Grant & Grant (2000) show<br />

that the result persisted in<br />

future years. (0.4 in ≈ 10 mm.)<br />

Redrawn, by permission of the<br />

publisher, from Grant (1986).<br />

. . . influences the food supply ...<br />

. . . leading to evolution in Darwin’s<br />

finches<br />

Offspring bill depth (mm)<br />

11.0<br />

10.0<br />

9.0<br />

8.0<br />

G. fortis<br />

1976<br />

1978<br />

8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0<br />

Midparent bill depth (mm)<br />

about 180 individuals, with females being particularly hard hit; the sex ratio at the end<br />

of 1977 was about five males per female. As the sex difference shows, not all finches suffered<br />

equally a smaller birds died at a higher rate. The reason, again, lies in the food<br />

supply. At the beginning of the drought, the various types of seeds were present in their<br />

normal proportions. G fortis of all sizes take small seeds, and as the drought persisted,<br />

these smaller seeds were relatively reduced in numbers. The average available seed size<br />

became larger with time (Figure 9.2). Now the larger finches were favored, because they<br />

eat the larger, harder seeds more efficiently. The average finch size increased as the<br />

smaller birds died off. (Females died at a higher rate than males because females are on<br />

average smaller.) Size, as we have seen, is inherited. The differential mortality in the<br />

drought therefore caused an increase in the average size of finches born in the next<br />

generation: G. fortis born in 1978 were about 4% larger on average than those born<br />

before the drought.<br />

Four years later, in November 1982, the weather reversed. The rainfall of 1983 was<br />

exceptionally heavy and the dry volcanic landscape was covered with green in the periodic<br />

disturbance called El Niño (see Plate 4c and d, between pp. 68 and 69). Seed<br />

production was enormous. The theory developed for 1976–78 could now be tested.<br />

The conditions had reversed: the direction of evolution should go into reverse too.<br />

In the year after the 1983 El Niño event, there were more small seeds. If the smaller<br />

finches can in fact exploit small seeds more efficiently, the smaller finches should<br />

survive relatively better. The Grants again measured the sizes of G. fortis on Daphne<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!