02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

560 PART 5 / Macroevolution<br />

Molecular clocks suggest<br />

duplications occurred at certain<br />

times in angiosperm evolution<br />

Vertebrate origins may be<br />

associated with genome<br />

duplication<br />

the population, the genome size of the species will have gone up or down. The genome<br />

sequence of a modern species can be used to infer when duplications and deletions have<br />

occurred in the past, and we can ask what evolutionary events are associated with<br />

changes in the genome site.<br />

For example, the genome sequence of the weed Arabidopsis thaliana was published<br />

in December 2000. Arabidopsis is a common small weed, and is the main flowering<br />

plant of genomic research. Vision et al. (2000) analyzed the Arabidopsis genome and<br />

found a large number of blocks of genes that looked like duplicates: that is, one stretch<br />

of DNA looked like a duplicate of another stretch of DNA in the same genome. The<br />

duplications are not for single genes, or the whole genome, but for intermediate lengths<br />

of DNA and contain several genes. Vision et al. concentrated on 103 blocks, each containing<br />

seven or more genes. For each pair of duplicate blocks, they compared the<br />

sequence of the two (paralogous) copies of each gene. They then used a molecular clock<br />

inference to estimate the time when the duplication occurred.<br />

Most of the duplications seem to date back to three periods, at 100, 140, and 170 million<br />

years ago. Some of the duplications are older, perhaps 200 million years old. A few<br />

of them are more recent, being about 50 million years old. The modern Arabidopsis<br />

genome seems to reflect 3–5 major duplication periods in the past. These duplications<br />

mainly occurred in the Mesozoic geological era, 100–200 million years ago, which was<br />

a crucial time for the origin of the angiosperms. In Section 18.5 (p. 538), we saw that the<br />

time of origin of the angiosperms is uncertain. However, the molecular clock suggests<br />

that the dicotyledons split from monocotyledons about 180–210 million years ago. If<br />

so, the earliest (200 million-year-old) duplications now visible in the Arabidopsis<br />

genome may have originated at this time. In that case, one of the major breakthroughs<br />

of angiosperm evolution a the origin of dicotyledons a would have been associated<br />

with a round of increased gene numbers.<br />

In summary, Vision et al. (2000) used the genome sequence of Arabidposis to identify<br />

duplicated regions of DNA and the time when the duplications evolved. They suggested<br />

some associations between these duplications and evolutionary events. The<br />

association of the 200 million-year-old duplications and the origin of dicotyledons is<br />

just one example. Their suggestions, however, are tentative and require more research.<br />

The idea that duplications may be associated with the origin of a major group is an<br />

example of the kind of hypothesis we can test, even if the test is at present rudimentary.<br />

(Box 22.1, p. 624, will look at another association between gene duplication and an<br />

evolutionary event a the origin of alcohol metabolism and the origin of fruit.)<br />

We can now turn to another major evolutionary event that has been hypothesized to<br />

be associated with gene duplications: the origin of the vertebrates. Ohno (1970) used<br />

early measurements of the weight of DNA in several vertebrate and invertebrate species<br />

to argue that the whole genome had duplicated twice near the origin of the vertebrates.<br />

The vertebrate genomes were about four times the size of the invertebrate genomes in<br />

Ohno’s sample. This is now sometimes called the “2R” hypothesis, named after the two<br />

rounds of genome doubling. If gene numbers did increase fourfold at that time, the<br />

extra genes might be part of the explanation for the origin of vertebrates. Ohno’s<br />

hypothesis was relatively neglected until biologists noticed in the late 1980s that vertebrates<br />

contain four sets of Hox genes, compared with a single set in the fruitfly. The<br />

quadrupled Hox gene set seemed to fit Ohno’s hypothesis.<br />

The total number of genes in vertebrates, however, is not four times the number<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!