02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Certain non-linear relations can<br />

produce the bimodal response<br />

A polygenic, polymorphic character,<br />

subject to stabilizing selection ...<br />

relatively short veins. Initially, there is some variation in the population for genotype,<br />

and an associated normal distribution of vein lengths. Artificial selection produces flies<br />

with a higher concentration of the vein-inducing substance and with correspondingly<br />

longer wing veins. This process can continue until the population reaches a vein length<br />

of about 60–80. At that point, the normal (unimodal) variation for the amount of<br />

vein-inducing substance generates a bimodal distribution of vein lengths. The bimodal<br />

distribution will later disappear, as the population passes beyond the jump in the<br />

genotype–phenotype mapping function. Hence the observed response to selection.<br />

The relation of genotype and phenotype for vein length in Figure 9.13 is a hypothesis<br />

only; but it does show how in theory a bimodal response to selection could arise.<br />

The main points are that when the genotype–phenotype relation has the linear form<br />

of Figure 9.12a, there is a simple response to artificial selection. The population changes<br />

until the genetic variation is used up. However, we have no reason to think that this is<br />

the typical genotype–phenotype relation. When the relation is more complex, the<br />

response to artificial selection can be interestingly different, as the bimodal response to<br />

selection on wing vein length in fruitflies illustrates.<br />

9.10 Stabilizing selection reduces the genetic variability<br />

of a character<br />

We saw earlier that directional selection reduces the amount of genetic variation for a<br />

character, and this can be measured as a decrease in heritability (see Table 9.2). But<br />

what about stabilizing selection? In nature, many (perhaps most) characters are subject<br />

to stabilizing selection, in which the extremes on either side of some optimum are<br />

selected against. (See Section 4.4, p. 78, where Figure 4.4 illustrates how birth weight in<br />

humans is an example of stabilizing selection.)<br />

Stabilizing selection will also tend to reduce heritable variation. Consider a character<br />

that is influenced by a large number of genes. Some of the genes increase the value of<br />

the character and some of them decrease it. Suppose that the character is influenced by<br />

10 loci, and at each two alleles are present. One of the two alleles increases (+) the value<br />

of the character, the other decreases (–) it. An individual’s haplotypes will then each be<br />

a series of alleles, and might for example be symbolized by –++–+––++. Natural selection<br />

favors individuals with an intermediate phenotype, produced by any genotype<br />

made up of half + genes and half − genes. Here are three examples:<br />

++++++++++ +++++––––– +++++–––––<br />

–––––––––– –––––+++++ +++++–––––<br />

(1) (2) (3)<br />

CHAPTER 9 / Quantitative Genetics 245<br />

Four different haplotypes are found in these three individuals. In a population that<br />

contains these four haplotypes, the three genotypes (1), (2), and (3) will all have the<br />

same fitness. We might expect the population to retain considerable genetic variation<br />

as these genotypes interbreed and produce a variety of offspring types. However genotypes<br />

like (3) that breed true have a small advantage. All the offspring of genotype (3)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!