02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

156 PART 2 / <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Genetics<br />

Molecular evolution is studied in<br />

substitutions between species and<br />

polymorphisms within species<br />

Molecular evolution may be driven<br />

by selection or drift<br />

7.1 Random drift and natural selection can both<br />

hypothetically explain molecular evolution<br />

<strong>Evolution</strong>, at the molecular level, is observable as nucleotide (or base) changes in the<br />

DNA and amino acid changes in proteins. The word substitution is often used to refer to<br />

an evolutionary change. In particular, a gene (or a nucleotide) substitution means that<br />

one form of a gene (or a nucleotide) increases in frequency from being rare in the population<br />

to being common. <strong>Evolution</strong>ary substitutions are studied by comparing different<br />

species. If one species has nucleotide A at a certain site and another species has nucleotide<br />

G, then at least one substitution must have occurred in the evolutionary lineage<br />

connecting the two species. Molecular evolution is also studied by looking at polymorphisms<br />

within a species. A polymorphism exists if, for example, some individuals of<br />

a species have nucleotide A at a certain site while other individuals have G. A complete<br />

substitution has not occurred, because both A and G are in fairly high frequency, but<br />

some process must have driven up the frequency of one or both nucleotides in the past.<br />

Polymorphism within a species, and evolutionary change between species, can be<br />

explained by two processes: natural selection and drift. This chapter will be looking at<br />

the contributions of drift and selection in molecular evolution. The subject hardly<br />

existed before the 1960s. Then gel electrophoresis (Section 4.5, p. 83) started to be<br />

used to study polymorphism, and the amino acid sequences of some proteins (such as<br />

cytochrome c and hemoglobin) became available for several species. The early evidence<br />

led Kimura (1968) and King & Jukes (1969) to suggest what Kimura called the neutral<br />

theory of molecular evolution. Motoo Kimura (who lived from 1924 to 1994) was a<br />

Japanese geneticist, and it was particularly him and his followers who promoted the<br />

neutral theory in the two decades after those original publications in 1968 and 1969.<br />

The neutral theory does not suggest that random drift explains all evolutionary<br />

change. Natural selection is still needed to explain adaptation. It is, however, possible<br />

that the adaptations we observe in organisms required only a small proportion of all the<br />

evolutionary changes that have actually taken place in the DNA. The neutral theory<br />

states that evolution at the level of DNA and proteins, but not of adaptation, is dominated<br />

by random processes; most evolution at the molecular level would then be nonadaptive.<br />

We can contrast the neutral theory with its opposite: the idea that almost all<br />

molecular evolution has been driven by natural selection.<br />

The difference between the two ideas can be understood in terms of the frequency<br />

distribution for the selection coefficients of mutations, or genetic variants. (It does not<br />

matter here whether we talk about new mutations or the set of genetic variants existing<br />

in a population at a genetic locus. “Genetic variant” could be substituted for “mutation”<br />

throughout this paragraph.) Given a mutation of a certain selection coefficient, the theory<br />

of random drift or selection (as described in Chapters 5 and 6) applies in a mathematically<br />

automatic way. If the selection coefficient is positive, the mutation increases in<br />

frequency; if it is negative, it is eliminated; if it is zero, the gene frequencies drift. 1<br />

1 This chapter uses a slightly different notation for selection coefficients from Chapter 5. In Chapter 5, the<br />

genotype with the highest fitness was given a fitness of 1 and the other genotypes were given fitnesses like (1 − s).<br />

Here we shall be interested in whether one form of a molecule has a higher, lower, or equal, fitness with another<br />

form, and it will be more convenient to talk about selection coefficients that are +, 0, or –. A +ve selection<br />

coefficient means natural selection favors the variant; –ve means it is selected against; 0 means it is neutral.<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!