02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

516 PART 4 / <strong>Evolution</strong> and Diversity<br />

Several hypotheses exist to explain<br />

the greater proliferation of North<br />

American mammals<br />

Table 17.3<br />

Relative brain sizes (expressed as an encephalization quotient, EQ (Section 22.6, p. 632),<br />

which increases with increasing brain size) of North and of South American ungulates in the<br />

Cenozoic. From Jerison (1973).<br />

Ungulate brain size (EQ)<br />

Time<br />

(Myr BP) South America North America<br />

65–22 0.44 0.38<br />

n = 9 n = 22<br />

22–2 0.47 0.63<br />

n = 11 n = 13<br />

continued. The North American mammals showed their superiority, therefore, not in<br />

the original invasion, but in their relative success afterwards.<br />

Why did the North American mammals prove superior? The increase in number of<br />

originally North American genera can be seen across a wide range of mammal types,<br />

which suggests they had some general advantage. There are several ideas why. One is<br />

that the North American mammals had lived a more competitive life, in a larger<br />

continent with more species, than the isolated southern mammals. The “arms race” of<br />

competition had moved further in the north. The idea can be illustrated by Jerison’s<br />

(1973) study of brain size (Section 22.6, p. 632).<br />

In North American mammals, brain sizes, relative to body size, increased with time<br />

in both predators and prey in the past 65 million years. Jerison’s interpretation is<br />

that brain sizes increased as predators and prey grew increasingly intelligent, in an<br />

escalating improvement of offensive and defensive behavior, and the pattern of brain<br />

evolution fits his interpretation (Figure 22.11, p. 633). However, in South American<br />

mammals, no such increase seems to have happened (Table 17.3). Arguably, then,<br />

when the North American mammals invaded the south they had been prepared by 50<br />

million years or so of more demanding competition. They possessed advanced armaments,<br />

probably not only in intelligence, that enabled them to overrun the southern<br />

mammals.<br />

Alternatively, as Marshall and his coauthors suggest, the North American mammals<br />

may have enjoyed some advantage in the environmental change of the past 3 million<br />

years. The Andean upthrust sheltered the Americas from the Pacific, creating a rain<br />

shadow east of the mountains. In South America, dryer pampas or even semidesert<br />

replaced the moist savannah and forest. Quite why such a change should benefit the<br />

North American mammals at the expense of the South American forms is unclear; but<br />

such a change would be likely to benefit one of the two groups more than the other. It<br />

was a large change, and was therefore probably influential in the faunal replacements of<br />

the time.<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!