02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

306 PART 3 / Adaptation and Natural Selection<br />

Heritability is the key to which<br />

levels of organization show<br />

adaptations<br />

Organisms show heritability in this sense. A finch with an improved beak shape,<br />

caused by a genetic change, will on average produce offspring with the improved beak<br />

shape. Natural selection can work on individual finches.<br />

But groups do not show this sort of heritability when group and individual advantage<br />

are in conflict. 1 A genetic variant that increases a group’s chance of success tends<br />

not to be inherited by future groups. Immigration contaminates the group’s genetic<br />

composition, such that heritability from generation to generation is low. Thus altruistic<br />

groups do not exclusively generate descendant altruistic groups, and selfish groups<br />

generate selfish groups. Migration from selfish groups causes altruistic groups to<br />

become selfish. Thus a group in one generation will only be genetically correlated with<br />

the group of its offspring in the next generation when there is practically no migration;<br />

then group selection works.<br />

The same point can be made about kin selection and selection among cell lines.<br />

Kin selection operates because an “offspring” kin group genetically resembles the<br />

“parental” kin group. Cell selection, in Weismannist species, tends not to operate<br />

because somatic cells, although they are inherited down a cell line during one organism’s<br />

brief life, are not passed on from an organism to its offspring; but when they are<br />

(in non-Weismannist species), cell selection and the evolution of cell line adaptations<br />

becomes theoretically more plausible. For genic adaptations such as segregation distortion,<br />

the same basic argument applies.<br />

In summary, we should expect to find adaptations existing for the benefit of those<br />

units in nature that show heritability. Adaptations will, therefore, usually benefit<br />

organisms. The cases of adaptations that benefit higher or lower levels of organization<br />

can be understood in the same general terms, because they only evolve in circumstances<br />

when groups, or parts, of organisms show heritability from one generation to<br />

the next. We can now give our first answer to the question of what is the unit of selection.<br />

The general answer is “that entity that shows heritability”; more specifically, it is<br />

usually the organism, with some interesting exceptions. This first answer specifies the<br />

units in nature that should possess adaptations.<br />

11.3 Another sense of “unit of selection” is the entity whose<br />

frequency is adjusted directly by natural selection<br />

Natural selection over the generations adjusts the frequencies of entities at all levels. We<br />

have implicitly seen this in the example of the lion hunt. If the lions of one pride<br />

become more efficient at hunting, perhaps because of some new behavioral trick, natural<br />

selection will favor them. If the trick is inherited, that type of lion will increase in<br />

frequency relative to other types of lion. All things associated with the trick will increase<br />

in frequency too. The type of lion, its type of neurons and proteins, and their encoding<br />

genes would all increase in frequency relative to their alternatives. When the hunting<br />

1 Species-level heritability does exist with species selection, because individual and species advantage are not<br />

in conflict (Section 23.6.3, p. 665). That is why species selection is more widely accepted, in theory, than group<br />

selection.<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!