02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

..<br />

Score<br />

Change in score per<br />

million years<br />

(a) Modernization of a lungfish character complex<br />

0<br />

10<br />

20<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50<br />

60<br />

70<br />

80<br />

90<br />

100<br />

350 250 150 50<br />

Age (Myr BP)<br />

(b) Rate of evolution in lungfish<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

350 250 150<br />

Age (Myr BP)<br />

50<br />

Figure 21.9<br />

(a) <strong>Evolution</strong> in lungfish, shown as the total score for each<br />

fossil (the text explains the scoring). Score 0 is for the most<br />

primitive form, and 100 for the most advanced. The rate of<br />

evolution is the slope of the graph: when the graph is flat,<br />

Lungfish have not always evolved<br />

slowly<br />

CHAPTER 21 / Rates of <strong>Evolution</strong> 607<br />

Dipterus (350 Myr BP)<br />

Neoceratodus (modern Australian lungfish)<br />

Protopterus (modern South African lungfish)<br />

evolution is not happening. (b) Rate of evolution. The<br />

graph is derived from (a) and shows the rate of change of<br />

the score through time. Lungfish have been living fossils<br />

since about 250 to 200 million years ago. Modified from<br />

Westoll (1949).<br />

change in the score measures the rate of evolution of the group. The numbers assigned<br />

to the character states are arbitrary, but they can still be used to portray evolutionary<br />

rates. (By the way, the lungfish in Westoll’s study are not a simple sequence of ancestors<br />

and descendants, in the way that the horses in MacFadden’s work probably were.<br />

Westoll’s rates are for evolution within the Dipnoi as a whole and are not rates of<br />

change down a single evolutionary lineage; the whole groups of Dipnoi would have<br />

contained many lineages.) Westoll’s results are shown in Figure 21.9. Dipnoi, it reveals,<br />

have not always been “living fossils.” Around 300 million years ago they were evolving<br />

rapidly, but since about 250 to 200 million years ago, their evolution has slowed right<br />

down. Their description as living fossils is accurate for the modern forms.<br />

The obvious biological question is why evolutionary change came almost to a stop in<br />

lungfish 200 million years ago. Lungfish are not the only examples of living fossils; other<br />

examples include the brachiopod Lingula and the horseshoe crab Limulus (Figure 21.10).<br />

The supreme examples of living fossils are the Cyanobacteria (sometimes called “bluegreen<br />

algae”) a 3 billion-year-old fossils look much like forms living today (Schopf<br />

1994). There are many particular conjectures about why these groups have changed so<br />

little, but no general theory. The question is an instance of the general question of why<br />

there should be evolutionary stasis. Their stability may be due to stabilizing selection

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!