02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Figure 15.4<br />

Convergence in marsupial<br />

and placental carnivores.<br />

(a) The reconstructed bodies<br />

and skulls of Thylacosmilus,<br />

a saber-toothed marsupial<br />

carnivore that lived in South<br />

America in the Pliocene and<br />

of Smilodon, a saber-toothed<br />

placental carnivore from the<br />

Pleistocene in North America.<br />

(b) Prothylacynus patagonicus,<br />

a borhyaenid marsupial from<br />

the early Miocene in Argentina;<br />

Thylacinus cynocephalus, the<br />

extinct marsupial Tasmanian<br />

wolf; and Canis lupus, the<br />

modern placental wolf. From<br />

Strickberger (1990). © 1990<br />

Jones & Bartlett Publishers.<br />

Convergent evolution produces<br />

homoplasies<br />

CHAPTER 15 / The Reconstruction of Phylogeny 429<br />

cause homoplasy; the most important cause is convergent evolution, when the same<br />

selection pressure has operated in two lineages. A classic example of convergence is<br />

seen in the two major groups of mammals, the marsupials and placentals (Figure 15.4).<br />

The marsupial and placental saber-toothed carnivores both evolved long, gashing<br />

canine teeth and there are also striking similarities in skull shape and body form in the<br />

marsupial and placental wolves. If we inferred the phylogeny of the marsupial wolf,<br />

placental wolf, and kangaroo from the pattern of phenetic similarity, we would obtain<br />

the wrong answer. The two wolves are phenetically more similar, even though the<br />

marsupial wolf is phylogenetically closer to the kangaroo than to the placental wolf.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!