02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

418 PART 4 / <strong>Evolution</strong> and Diversity<br />

later update of his views.) Fourthly, new species often arise by hybridization, particularly<br />

in plants. Fifthly, Darwin’s idea that isolation evolves as a by-product was<br />

expanded and explained genetically in the Dobzhansky–Muller theory.<br />

Now, 50 or more years later, the allopatric theory of speciation still stands up. Many<br />

biologists would allow some contribution from sympatric speciation, but most accept<br />

that allopatric speciation is the main process. In this respect, biologists now agree with<br />

the modern synthesis rather than Darwin. The second claim, that speciation is often<br />

powered by genetic drift now has few supporters. It is the least important of the five<br />

claims listed above, and may not have been strongly believed in even during the period<br />

from the 1930s to the 1950s. In the 1920s, biologists often suggested that the characters<br />

that differ between species are non-adaptive. This partly inspired “non-adaptive”<br />

theories of speciation, but few biologists now argue that species differences are nonadaptive.<br />

The experimental evidence and theory of speciation suggest the genetic drift<br />

is not all that important in speciation. Speciation is probably more often a by-product<br />

of normal adaptive divergence between populations.<br />

The theory of reinforcement has had its ups and downs. Reinforcement continues to<br />

tantalize biologists, but a compelling case for its importance has yet to be made. The<br />

theory of hybrid speciation in plants, by contrast, has held up well. New genetic techniques<br />

have enabled biologists to trace the ancestry of modern species, providing a<br />

detailed description of hybrid speciation.<br />

Finally, the genetics of postzygotic isolation has become a major field of research.<br />

Darwin seems to have been right that postzygotic isolation evolves as an incidental byproduct<br />

of divergence. The Dobzhansky–Muller theory improved our understanding<br />

of the genetic events by which postzygotic isolation can incidentally drop out of normal<br />

evolutionary change. Evidence for the theory has accumulated, not least as the evidence<br />

for Haldane’s rule has been incorporated (if partly) in the general theoretical scheme.<br />

The Dobzhansky–Muller theory looks as if it may continue to inspire research as the<br />

techniques of modern genomics are imported into the study of speciation.<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!