02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20 PART 1 / Introduction<br />

Further reading<br />

Study and review questions<br />

1 Review the ways in which biological evolution differs<br />

from individual development, changes in the species<br />

composition of ecosystems, and some other kinds of<br />

change that you can think of.<br />

2 What property of nature must any theory of evolution<br />

explain, if it is not (in Darwin’s words) to be “almost<br />

useless.”<br />

A popular essay about the adaptations of woodpeckers is by Diamond (1990). Bowler<br />

(1989) provides a general history of the idea of evolution. On Lamarck and his context,<br />

see Burkhardt (1977) and Barthélemy-Madaule (1982); and Rudwick (1997) for<br />

Cuvier. There are many biographies of Darwin; Browne (1995–2002) is as near to a<br />

“standard” modern biography as any. Darwin’s autobiography is an interesting source.<br />

A pleasant (if more demanding) way to follow Darwin’s life is through his correspondence:<br />

a modern scholarly edition is under way (Burkhardt & Smith 1985–). Bowler<br />

(1989) discusses and gives references about the reception and fate of Darwin’s ideas.<br />

Berry (2002) is a readable anthology from Wallace’s writings. On the modern synthesis,<br />

see also Provine (1971), Mayr & Provine (1980), Bowler (1996), and Gould (2002b).<br />

Numbers (1998) is about the American reception of Darwinism.<br />

There are biographies of many of the key figures: Box (1978) for Fisher; Clark (1969)<br />

for Haldane; Provine (1986) for Wright. Huxley (1970–73) and Simpson (1978) wrote<br />

autobiographies. Laporte (2000) is an intellectual biography of Simpson. See Adams<br />

(1994) for Dobzhansky, and Powell (1997) for the contributions of the “Drosophila<br />

model” to evolution. See the papers in a dedicatory issue of <strong>Evolution</strong> (1994), vol. 48,<br />

pp. 1–44, for Mayr. See the special issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of<br />

Sciences USA (2000), vol. 97, pp. 6941–7055 for Stebbins.<br />

<strong>Evolution</strong> is probably better covered than any other scientific theory by popular<br />

science writers. Dawkins (1986, 1989a, 1996) introduces many ideas in evolution, particularly<br />

those to do with adaptation and natural selection. Gould’s popular essays,<br />

which first appeared in Natural History magazine from 1974 to 1999, have been anthologized<br />

in a series of books and introduce many aspects of evolutionary biology (Gould<br />

1977b, 1980, 1983, 1985, 1991, 1993, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002a). Jones (1999) is a popular<br />

update of Darwin’s Origin of Species: it keeps Darwin’s original structure, and uses<br />

modern examples. Mayr (2001) is an overview of the subject for a general reader, as<br />

well as containing the current views of an authoritative writer.<br />

Pagel (2002) and the encyclopedia of the life sciences (www.els.net) are encyclopedias<br />

of evolution and of biology, respectively. The encyclopedia of life sciences<br />

is comprehensive on evolution. <strong>Evolution</strong> is covered in many web pages, and links<br />

are provided to them from the web page associated with this book (www.blackwellscience.com/evolution).<br />

Zimmer (2001) is a popular book about evolution, accompanying<br />

a PBS TV series. Trends in Ecology and <strong>Evolution</strong> is a good one-stop source<br />

to follow a wide range of evolutionary research.<br />

3 How did the main popular concept of evolution in the<br />

late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries differ from<br />

the conception of evolution in Darwin’s theory?<br />

4 What are the two theories that are combined in the<br />

synthetic theory of evolution?<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!