02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Frequency<br />

Fitness<br />

(number of offspring produced)<br />

Average size (in population)<br />

CHAPTER 4 / Natural Selection and Variation 77<br />

(a) Directional selection (b) Stabilizing selection (c) Disruptive selection (d) No selection<br />

Body size Body size Body size Body size<br />

Body size Body size Body size Body size<br />

Time Time Time<br />

Time<br />

Figure 4.2<br />

Three kinds of selection. The top line shows the frequency<br />

distribution of the character (body size). For many characters<br />

in nature, this distribution has a peak in the middle, near<br />

the average, and is lower at the extremes. (The normal<br />

distribution, or “bell curve,” is a particular example of<br />

this kind of distribution.) The second line shows the relation<br />

between body size and fitness, within one generation, and<br />

the third the expected change in the average for the character<br />

over many generations (if body size is inherited).<br />

(a) Directional selection. Smaller individuals have higher<br />

fitness, and the species will decrease in average body size<br />

through time. Figure 4.3 is an example. (b) Stabilizing<br />

selection. Intermediate-sized individuals have higher<br />

fitness. Figure 4.4a is an example. (c) Disruptive selection.<br />

Both extremes are favored and if selection is strong enough,<br />

the population splits into two. Figure 4.5 is an example.<br />

(d) No selection. If there is no relation between the<br />

character and fitness, natural selection is not operating<br />

on it.<br />

lighter than average did not survive as well as babies of average weight. Stabilizing selection<br />

has probably operated on birth weight in human populations from the time of the<br />

evolutionary expansion of our brains about 1–2 million years ago until the twentieth<br />

century. In most of the world it still does. However, in the 50 years since Karn and<br />

Penrose’s (1951) study, the force of stabilizing selection on birth weight has relaxed in<br />

wealthy countries (Figure 4.4b), and by the late 1980s it had almost disappeared. The<br />

pattern has approached that of Figure 4.2d: percent survival has become almost the<br />

same for all birth weights. Selection has relaxed because of improved care for premature

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!