02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

250 PART 2 / <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Genetics<br />

Summary<br />

1 Quantitative genetics, which is concerned with<br />

characters controlled by many genes, considers the<br />

changes in phenotypic and genotypic frequency distributions<br />

between generations, rather than following<br />

the fate of individual genes.<br />

2 The phenotypic variance of a character in a<br />

population can be divided into components due<br />

to genetic and environmental differences between<br />

individuals.<br />

3 Some of the genetic effects on an individual’s<br />

phenotype are inherited by its offspring; others are<br />

not. The former are called additive genetic effects and<br />

the latter are due to such factors as dominance and<br />

epistatic interaction between genes.<br />

4 The heritability of a character is the proportion of<br />

its total phenotypic variance in a population that is<br />

additive.<br />

5 The heritability of a character determines its evolutionary<br />

response to selection.<br />

6 The additive genetic variance can be measured by<br />

the correlation between relatives, or by artificial selection<br />

experiments.<br />

response to selection can be analyzed by means of the heritability of a character, which<br />

is the fraction of its variation due to additive genetic effects. However, even with simple<br />

directional selection, the exact response depends on the underlying genetic control. For<br />

example, the possible threshold relation between the genotype and phenotype for the<br />

wing veins of the fruitfly generates an interesting bimodal response to selection. Here,<br />

the heritability of the character would show strange changes as the character evolved.<br />

Directional selection unambiguously should continue to alter a character until its heritability<br />

is reduced to zero. With stabilizing selection, it might be thought that many<br />

genotypes could be maintained if they all produce the same intermediate phenotype.<br />

However, even here it can be argued that all but one of the genotypes should eventually<br />

be eliminated by selection. The argument appears to be contradicted by the facts, and<br />

biologists do not yet fully understand the observed values of heritabilities in natural<br />

populations.<br />

7 The strength of selection can be estimated as a<br />

selection differential, either directly by measuring<br />

reproductively successful individuals and average<br />

individuals in a population, or indirectly, using measurements<br />

of heritability and of observed evolutionary<br />

change in a population. Selection differentials often<br />

have values in the range −0.2 to +0.2 in populations<br />

that are experiencing directional selection.<br />

8 The response of a population to artificial selection<br />

depends on the amount of additive genetic variability<br />

and on the relation between genotype and phenotype.<br />

If the relation is non-linear, strange bimodal responses<br />

can arise.<br />

9 Stabilizing selection acts to reduce the amount of<br />

genetic variability in a population. However, polygenic<br />

characters show non-trivial values for heritability.<br />

10 Biologists do not completely understand the obseved<br />

levels of heritability for characters in natural populations.<br />

Genetic variation is maintained by some mix of<br />

mutation and selection. Some characters do evolve by<br />

the amount predicted from their heritability and the<br />

strength of selection; others, however, seem not to.<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!