02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

318 PART 3 / Adaptation and Natural Selection<br />

Figure 12.4<br />

The taxonomic distribution of<br />

asexual reproduction is spindly<br />

and is found in odd isolated<br />

taxa.<br />

Sex may exist despite an individual<br />

disadvantage<br />

Asexual<br />

favorable mutations; the greater speed with which the different favorable mutations<br />

combine together causes the sexual population to evolve faster. The higher the rate<br />

at which favorable mutations are arising, the greater the evolutionary rate of a sexual<br />

relative to an asexual population.<br />

Other factors can also influence the relative rate of evolution in sexual and asexual<br />

populations. However, the basic Fisher–Muller result remains valid in many, if not all,<br />

circumstances. Rice & Chippindale (2001) experimentally demonstrated that the<br />

Fisher–Muller theory can be realistic. They found that the rate of evolution was faster in<br />

the presence, than in the absence, of sexual recombination.<br />

12.1.4 Is sex maintained by group selection?<br />

Asexual<br />

Perhaps the commonest answer to the question of why sex exists is that it speeds up the<br />

rate of evolution. This is the “group selection” theory of sex. It accepts that sex is disadvantageous<br />

for the individual, because of its 50% cost, but claims that the cost is more<br />

than made up for by the reduced extinction rate of populations, or groups, of sexually<br />

reproducing organisms. Sexual populations, or groups, can accumulate superior adaptations<br />

more rapidly than asexual populations, or groups. The asexual population will<br />

then be out-competed and go extinct faster. Each sexual female is in a sense sacrificing<br />

herself (she could produce more offspring by reproducing asexually) in order to save<br />

the group from extinction.<br />

The main argument for group selection, as an explanation for sex, comes from<br />

the taxonomic distribution of asexual reproduction. In multicellular life, exclusively<br />

asexual reproduction is mainly confined to small twigs of the phytogenetic tree (Figure<br />

12.4). 1 A few exceptions have been suggested, but it is difficult to be sure that an<br />

1 The spindly taxonomic distribution of asexuality only applies to multicellular life. In single-celled and viral<br />

life, there probably are large chunks of the phylogenetic tree in which asexual reproduction prevails. Many<br />

(and arguably all) bacteria, for instance, may do without sex, though this is far from confirmed. But we are not<br />

concerned with those single-celled forms here.<br />

Asexual<br />

Asexual<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!