02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Brain size<br />

. . . are used to measure<br />

intelligence<br />

Body size<br />

Figure 22.11<br />

The distribution of relative<br />

brain sizes for (a) ungulates<br />

(prey) and (b) carnivores<br />

(predators) through the<br />

Cenozoic. Brain size increased<br />

over time and at any one time<br />

carnivores had bigger brains<br />

than ungulates. Redrawn, by<br />

permission of the publisher,<br />

from Jerison (1973).<br />

Deviation from allometric line<br />

Allometric<br />

line<br />

CHAPTER 22 / Coevolution 633<br />

Figure 22.10<br />

Relative brain size may be measured as relative encephalization<br />

by the deviation of a species’ brain size from the allometric line<br />

for many species. Relative encephalization measures whether a<br />

species has a brain larger or smaller than would be expected for an<br />

animal with its body size. The species indicated in the figure has a<br />

relatively small brain, and an encephalization quotient below one.<br />

below the line, the encephalization quotient is less than one; if it is above the line, the<br />

encephalization quotient is more than one. Encephalization quotients are sometimes<br />

thought of as a crude measure of “intelligence” in a species. The more intelligent<br />

animals, in a loose sense, are those that deviate further above the line; they have<br />

greater relative encephalization.<br />

Let us provisionally accept here that the encephalization quotient is an index of<br />

intelligence. We can then consider, from the classic work of Jerison (1973), a possible<br />

example of coevolution between prey and predator. (We met a related part of<br />

Jerison’s general study when we discussed the Great American Interchange in Section<br />

17.8, p. 512.)<br />

In Cenozoic mammals, predators typically have relatively larger brains than their<br />

prey. This relation can be seen in Figure 22.11; but the same figure also shows another,<br />

more interesting fact. The relative brain sizes of both predators and prey have increased<br />

Frequency (arbitrary units)<br />

Frequency (arbitrary units)<br />

(a) Ungulates<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

(b) Carnivores<br />

Archaic<br />

Paleogene<br />

Archaic<br />

Neogene<br />

Paleogene<br />

Neogene<br />

Recent<br />

0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0<br />

Relative brain size<br />

Recent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!