02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

350 PART 4 / <strong>Evolution</strong> and Diversity<br />

Time<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Form, or character state (e.g., beak size)<br />

The evolutionary controversies<br />

about species are not mainly<br />

concerned with practical or formal<br />

issues<br />

Two species<br />

Ambiguous zone<br />

One ancestral species<br />

Figure 13.2<br />

Difficulties in species recognition are expected in the theory of<br />

evolution, because variation exists within each species and new<br />

species evolve by the splitting of ancestral species. During the<br />

evolution of new species, the distinction between the species will<br />

be ambiguous during times 2 and 3. At stage 3, for instance, no<br />

phenotypic character can unambiguously distinguish between<br />

two species; indeed two species do not yet exist.<br />

division of the ring would also be theoretically meaningless: there really is a continuum,<br />

not a number of clear-cut, separate species. Problems of this kind are exactly what we<br />

should expect given that species originated by an evolutionary process. We should not<br />

expect clear-cut defining characters to exist for all species; that is not the way nature is.<br />

Species are in practice mainly recognized by phenetic characters, more or less successfully.<br />

However, when evolutionary biologists discuss species concepts, they are not<br />

usually discussing how species are recognized in practice. They are discussing deeper,<br />

theoretical concepts of species, concepts that may lie beneath the practical procedures<br />

that are used to recognize particular species. Is the bald eagle just the set of eagles that<br />

have white heads and tails? Imagine that a parental pair of bald eagles with good white<br />

heads and tails produced a nest of eagles of some different color pattern. Would they<br />

have given birth to a new species? If the color of the head and tail was all there was to<br />

being a member of Haliaeetus leucocephalus, then the answer would clearly be yes.<br />

However, if the species have a more fundamental definition, and the coloration was<br />

picked only as a practically useful marker, then the answer would be no. Indeed, the<br />

new eagles without the white coloration would render that taxonomic character out of<br />

date, and it would be time to start looking for some other characters to recognize the<br />

species. Most of the discussion of species concepts that follows assumes that species<br />

definition has some deeper meaning than the phenetic characters used to recognize the<br />

species in practice. When biologists argue about species concepts they are not arguing<br />

about how species are defined in practice.<br />

13.2 Several closely related species concepts exist<br />

A first distinction among species concepts is between horizontal and vertical concepts<br />

(Figure 13.3). A horizontal concept aims to define which individuals belong to which<br />

species at any instant in time. A vertical concept aims to define which individuals<br />

belong to which species at all times. Vertical concepts are mentioned here mainly for<br />

completeness; most of the interest in species concepts is in horizontal concepts.<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!