02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

..<br />

(a)<br />

A<br />

(b)<br />

2<br />

1<br />

B<br />

C<br />

Vertebrate<br />

1<br />

2<br />

D<br />

Insect<br />

The hypothesis can be tested by the<br />

shape of gene trees<br />

3<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Insect<br />

Vertebrate<br />

in invertebrates. Humans are thought to have about 30,000 genes, against 13,000 in<br />

fruitflies and 19,000 in the worm Caenorhabditis elegans. These gene numbers alone,<br />

however, do not refute Ohno’s hypothesis, because some genes could have been lost<br />

after the two rounds of duplications. Gene numbers might have initially increased from<br />

15,000 to 60,000, and then almost half the new genes may have been lost between then<br />

and modern humans. A stronger test of Ohno’s 2R hypothesis can be made using the<br />

shape of gene trees (Hughes 1999; Martin 1999; Section 15.11.5, p. 457, defines gene<br />

trees) (Figure 19.2).<br />

The test uses any gene that appears to contain four paralogs in vertebrate genomes,<br />

but only a single copy in invertebrate genomes. If Ohno’s hypothesis is correct, these<br />

genes will all have originated in the same two rounds of duplication at the origin of the<br />

vertebrates and the resulting gene tree of the four will be symmetric (Figure 19.2a). In<br />

fact, in the majority of four-paralog sets analyzed by Hughes and Martin, the gene trees<br />

were not symmetric (Figure 19.2b). The evidence does not support the 2R hypothesis,<br />

which is one of the main reasons why many biologists currently doubt whether the origin<br />

of vertebrates was also the occasion of two great rounds of gene doubling.<br />

Vertebrates do contain more genes than invertebrates, but the extra genes probably<br />

evolved in a series of separate events in different gene families rather than in one or two<br />

big polyploidizations. Supporters of the 2R hypothesis still exist, however. They note<br />

that the tests performed so far are preliminary, and use only a small number of genes.<br />

They think there may be life in the old hypothesis yet, and it will certainly continue to<br />

be tested, as new evidence or methods become available.<br />

The research program that we have looked at in this section is concerned to test<br />

whether new taxonomic groups evolve by means of gene duplications. In general, it is<br />

interesting to test what genomic events underlie events in morphological evolution. A<br />

new group might evolve by gene duplication, or sequence evolution within a fixed<br />

number of genes, or a mix of the two factors. Genome sequences can be used to find out.<br />

19.4 Genome size can shrink by gene loss<br />

CHAPTER 19 / <strong>Evolution</strong>ary Genomics 561<br />

Figure 19.2<br />

Testing the 2R hypothesis by gene tree shape. The 2R hypothesis<br />

suggests that two rounds of whole genome duplication occurred<br />

near the origin of the vertebrates. A, B, C, and D are four related<br />

copies of a gene, and they originated at gene duplications<br />

(numbered 1, 2, and 3). (a) If the 2R hypothesis is right, genes<br />

that have four related copies in a vertebrate genome should have<br />

a symmetric gene tree (1 and 2 correspond to the two wholegenome<br />

duplications). (b) In principle, these four genes could<br />

have many other gene tree shapes. For instance, if a gene initially<br />

duplicates and then only one of the copies duplicates again, and in<br />

turn only one of the new copies duplicates again. The result is four<br />

related genes, but not by two whole-genome duplication events.<br />

Some bacteria live inside the cells of other species, either as parasites or intracellular<br />

symbionts. All such bacteria that have been appropriately studied share a common

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!