02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

..<br />

Most hybrid zones are due to<br />

secondary contact<br />

14.9.2 Evidence for the theory of parapatric speciation is<br />

relatively weak<br />

The theory of parapatric speciation has two main weak points in the evidence. One is<br />

the evolutionary history of hybrid zones. Hybrid zones can be “primary” or “secondary.”<br />

A hybrid zone is primary if it evolved while the species had approximately<br />

their current geographic distribution. It is secondary if in the past the species was subdivided<br />

into separate populations, where the differences between the forms evolved,<br />

and the populations later expanded and met up at what is now the hybrid zone. Real<br />

hybrid zones only illustrate a stage in parapatric speciation if they are primary. The<br />

abundance of hybrid zones in nature would only be evidence that parapatric speciation<br />

is a plausible process if those hybrid zones are mainly primary. If most hybrid zones are<br />

secondary, the difference between the forms evolved allopatrically not parapatrically.<br />

In fact the evidence suggests that most hybrid zones are secondary. Hooded and carrion<br />

crows, for instance, have met up after their ranges expanded following the most recent<br />

ice age. Indeed, range expansion following the ice age is a common explanation of<br />

hybrid zones (Section 17.4, p. 497). Hybrid zones provide little support for the theory<br />

of parapatric speciation.<br />

Secondly, if reinforcement operates in hybrid zones, we predict that prezygotic<br />

isolation will be stronger in the hybrid zone than between the two forms away from<br />

the hybrid zone. The prediction is a special case of the general biogeographic test of<br />

reinforcement (Section 14.6.3). The evidence does not support the prediction: we have<br />

little good evidence that prezygotic isolation is reinforced in hybrid zones.<br />

Thus, the process of parapatric speciation is possible in theory. The theory solves one<br />

key problem in reinforcement. Most (but not all) stages of parapatric speciation can be<br />

illustrated by evidence. But parapatric speciation lacks the solid weight of supporting<br />

evidence and the theoretical near inevitability of allopatric speciation. Parapatric speciation<br />

cannot be ruled out, and probably operates in some cases. But the case that it is<br />

important has still to be made.<br />

14.10 Sympatric speciation<br />

14.10.1 Sympatric speciation is theoretically possible<br />

CHAPTER 14 / Speciation 411<br />

In sympatric speciation, a species splits into two without any separation of the ancestral<br />

species’ geographic range (see Figure 14.1). Sympatric speciation has been a source of<br />

recurrent controversy for a century or so. Mayr (1942, 1963) particularly cast doubt on<br />

it, and in doing so has stimulated others to look for evidence and to work out the theoretical<br />

conditions under which it may be possible.<br />

In the theory of parapatric speciation, the initial stage in speciation is a spatial<br />

polymorphism (or stepped cline). In sympatric speciation, the initial stage is a polymorphism<br />

that does not depend on space within a population. For instance, two forms<br />

of a species may be adapted to eat different foods. If matings between the two are disadvantageous,<br />

because hybrids have low fitness, reinforcement will operate between

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!