02.05.2013 Views

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

Evolution__3rd_Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

674 PART 5 / Macroevolution<br />

Changes in the total diversity of life<br />

may fit ...<br />

...a logistic model ...<br />

low” for 40 million years until after the extinction of the dinosaurs. Only then did the<br />

mammals radiate into formerly dinosaurian niches. Thus, the fossil evidence may still<br />

be essentially correct. It shows when the main mammal orders proliferated, rather than<br />

when they originated. This reconciliation between the molecular and fossil evidence is<br />

similar to the case of the Cambrian explosion (Section 18.4, p. 535). The reconciliation<br />

is plausible, and popular, but by no means confirmed a after all, we know nothing<br />

about the Cretaceous representatives of the modern mammal orders, except that they<br />

probably existed.<br />

In summary, many examples exist through the history of life when one taxon<br />

replaces another. One question we can ask about replacements is whether they were<br />

competitive or independent. The main class of evidence comes from the time course of<br />

the rise of one taxon, and the fall of the other (see Figure 23.11). Other evidence comes<br />

from direct competition, such as bryozoan overgrowth. One possible example of independent<br />

replacement, that of dinosaurs and mammals, has been reanalyzed recently<br />

and, although the revised picture does not show that the replacement was competitive,<br />

a formerly watertight case for independent replacement has sprung a leak. The role of<br />

the Cretaceous mass extinction in the rise of the mammals is less certain than it<br />

appeared to be 10 years ago, in the early to mid-1990s.<br />

23.8 Species diversity may have increased logistically or<br />

exponentially since the Cambrian, or it may have<br />

increased little at all<br />

The number of species alive on Earth today is uncertain, with estimates ranging from<br />

10 to 100 million species. About 2 million species have been described. At some point in<br />

the past, fewer species must have existed than now (this almost has to be true, if we trace<br />

back far enough a even to the origin of life). But how have the number of species<br />

changed over time? Early attempts to answer this question were made by Simpson,<br />

Valentine, and others, but modern thinking about it begins with Sepkoski’s database a<br />

the database for marine fossil animals we have met previously in this chapter.<br />

Figure 23.15a illustrates Sepkoski’s classic result. The y-axis is for numbers of families,<br />

but we can assume that numbers of species would show a similar pattern. Sepkoski<br />

distinguished three faunas: the Cambrian, Paleozoic, and Modern. The three differ in<br />

the kind of animals that were alive at the time. The data for the Cambrian is poor, and<br />

the important features of the graph are: (i) the rapid increase in diversity after the<br />

Cambrian, starting about 500 million years ago; (ii) the apparent “Paleozoic plateau”<br />

of constant diversity; (iii) the reduction in diversity at the Permian mass extinction;<br />

followed by (iv) the steadily increasing diversity since then (the end-Cretaceous mass<br />

extinction is only a blip in the steady rise).<br />

The increase of diversity, followed by a plateau, in the Paleozoic can be explained by<br />

a logistic model. Logistic increase is the kind of increase seen by ecologists when new<br />

resources are colonized. Numbers increase exponentially to begin with, due to the<br />

absence of competition. Then, as competitors fill up the resource space, no new species<br />

can be added except following the extinction of an existing species.<br />

..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!