Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi
Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi
Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
118<br />
In Estonia and Latvia <strong>the</strong> reorganised workplaces have, for <strong>the</strong>ir part, <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir relative share of <strong>the</strong> workers. In Lithuania, <strong>the</strong> development has<br />
clearly been <strong>the</strong> opposite. In 1998 – <strong>2002</strong>, <strong>the</strong> share of <strong>the</strong> new workplaces has<br />
clearly grown <strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong> Lithuania, where earlier <strong>the</strong>y were far fewer <strong>in</strong><br />
number than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two countries. In consequence, <strong>the</strong> proportion work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
at new companies <strong>in</strong> all three countries is now almost <strong>the</strong> same, a little<br />
over 40 per cent.<br />
It was seen above that <strong>in</strong> all three countries, <strong>the</strong> average salary level at new<br />
workplaces had def<strong>in</strong>itely dropped. The new workplaces have evidently been<br />
established more <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> low-paid sectors. Still <strong>in</strong> 1998, <strong>the</strong> salary level at <strong>the</strong><br />
new workplaces was higher than at <strong>the</strong> reorganised and old workplaces. In<br />
three years, <strong>the</strong> situation has taken an opposite turn.<br />
CONNECTION BETWEEN UNIONISATION AND<br />
SALARY LEVEL<br />
Below, <strong>the</strong> connection between unionisation and salary level <strong>in</strong> Estonia, Latvia<br />
and Lithuania is exam<strong>in</strong>ed. Is <strong>the</strong> average salary level higher for those workers<br />
who belong to a trade union? And does <strong>the</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g of collective agreements<br />
bear any relation to <strong>the</strong> salary level?<br />
Still <strong>in</strong> 1998, <strong>the</strong> median salary of <strong>the</strong> unionised workers (i.e. those belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to a trade union) was smaller than that of <strong>the</strong> non-unionised <strong>in</strong> Estonia, and<br />
even <strong>in</strong> Latvia it was only equally as great as <strong>the</strong> non-unionised workers' salary.<br />
The change dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> three years has been fairly great. In <strong>2002</strong> <strong>in</strong> Latvia<br />
and Lithuania, those who belonged to trade unions received a clearly better<br />
salary than those who did not. Even <strong>in</strong> Estonia, <strong>the</strong> gap between <strong>the</strong> non-unionised<br />
and <strong>the</strong> unionised has disappeared.<br />
With <strong>the</strong> aid of standard deviation, an approximate picture of <strong>the</strong> salary variation<br />
can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed. In Estonia and Lithuania, <strong>the</strong> salaries of workers who are<br />
not union members def<strong>in</strong>itely vary more than those of <strong>the</strong> union members. In<br />
Latvia <strong>in</strong> <strong>2002</strong>, <strong>the</strong> situation has changed so that <strong>the</strong> variation is greater for <strong>the</strong><br />
unionised. Salary differences <strong>in</strong> Latvia have grown as a general rule, as seen<br />
above.