05.06.2013 Views

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

Working Life Barometer in the Baltic Countries 2002 (pdf) - mol.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

222<br />

WORKING LIFE TRENDS IN ESTONIA, LATVIA, LITHUANIA,<br />

ST. PETERSBURG (1996) AND FINLAND<br />

Balances*<br />

Mean<strong>in</strong>gfulness<br />

of work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Self-development<br />

Management method<br />

Environmental issues<br />

Empowerment<br />

<strong>in</strong> own job<br />

Information<br />

on work aims<br />

Gender equality<br />

-30%<br />

*<br />

St. Petersburg 1996<br />

-20%<br />

-10%<br />

Lithuania <strong>2002</strong><br />

Estonia <strong>2002</strong><br />

Latvia <strong>2002</strong><br />

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%<br />

Balance = better direction (%-units) m<strong>in</strong>us worse direction (%-units)<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land <strong>2002</strong><br />

For comparison, this graph <strong>in</strong>cludes data for St. Petersburg from 1996 and for<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land from autumn <strong>2002</strong>. These show that <strong>the</strong> differences between countries<br />

can be really large. All <strong>the</strong> trend assessments for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> nations clearly<br />

come closer to those for F<strong>in</strong>land than to those for St. Petersburg, which differ<br />

very greatly from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r countries under comparison. Only where mean<strong>in</strong>gfulness<br />

of work<strong>in</strong>g was concerned were <strong>the</strong> views of <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>nish wage earners<br />

close to <strong>the</strong> views of those from St. Petersburg. In this aspect, <strong>the</strong>re is a big<br />

gap between <strong>the</strong>m and all three <strong>Baltic</strong> countries.<br />

The greatest difference between F<strong>in</strong>land and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> countries concerns <strong>the</strong><br />

evaluation of changes <strong>in</strong> environmental issues and, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gfulness of work<strong>in</strong>g. Views on <strong>the</strong> way environmental questions are<br />

handled at <strong>the</strong> workplace are considerably more positive <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land than <strong>in</strong><br />

Lithuania, Latvia or also Estonia. A third difference that emerges between<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> countries is that more wage earners <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land regard<br />

<strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong> gender equality as positive.<br />

When <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> countries are compared with each o<strong>the</strong>r, it is seen that <strong>the</strong><br />

Lithuanian wage earners take a somewhat more negative view of current<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g life than do <strong>the</strong> Estonians and Latvians. The differences<br />

are large <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of self-development, management methods, environ-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!